Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (5110K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kajitani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kajitani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ishihama, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1983, Vol. 11, No. 12 3873-3888
© 1983


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Determination of the promoter strength in the mixed transcription system, II. Promoters of ribosomal RNA, ribosomal protein S1 and recA protein operons from Escherichia coli

Masayuki Kajitani and Akira Ishihama*

Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University Kyoto 606, Japan

* To whom reprint requests should be sent.

Received April 26, 1983. Accepted May 20, 1983.

Using the in vitro mixed transcription system (Kajitani, M. and Ishihama, A. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 671–686), we determined the two parameters of the promoter strength, i.e., the rate of open complex formation between RNA poly= merase and promoter, and the saturation level of the open complex formation at equilibrium, for the promoters of ribosomal RNA (rrnE), ribosomal protein S1 (rpsA) and recA protein (recA) operons from Escherichia coli. Taken together with the previous determinations for lactose (lac(UV5)), tryptophan (trp) and ribosomal protein L10 (rplJ) operons, these studies revealed that the relative promoter strengths with respect to the kinetic parameter are 200, 70, 50, 40, 30, 20 and 2% of the reference promoter lacP(UV5) for recAp, rplJp, rpsAp3, trpP, rpsAp1, rrnEpl and rrnEp2, respectively, under our standard reaction conditions (50 mM NaCl and 37°C); and those with respect to the thermodynamic parameter are 70, 35, 20, 10, 10, 10 and 5% the level of lacP(UV5) for rrnEp2, trpP, rpsAp3, rplJp, rpsAp1, rrnEpl and recAp, respectively. The order of the promoter strength, however, changes with variation of the salt concentration or reaction temperature.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
V. McAlister, C. Zou, R. H. Winslow, and G. E. Christie
Purification and In Vitro Characterization of the Serratia marcescens NucC Protein, a Zinc-Binding Transcription Factor Homologous to P2 Ogr
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2003; 185(6): 1808 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
I. V. Boni, V. S. Artamonova, and M. Dreyfus
The Last RNA-Binding Repeat of the Escherichia coli Ribosomal Protein S1 Is Specifically Involved in Autogenous Control
J. Bacteriol., October 15, 2000; 182(20): 5872 - 5879.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. E. Choy
The Study of Guanosine 5'-Diphosphate 3'-Diphosphate-mediated Transcription Regulation in Vitro Using a Coupled Transcription-Translation System
J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2000; 275(10): 6783 - 6789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. T. Owens, R. Miyake, K. Murakami, A. J. Chmura, N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and C. F. Meares
Mapping the sigma 70 subunit contact sites on Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with a sigma 70-conjugated chemical protease
PNAS, May 26, 1998; 95(11): 6021 - 6026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Imamura, K. Yamanaka, T. Ogura, S. Hiraga, N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and H. Niki
Identification of the cpdA Gene Encoding Cyclic 3',5'-Adenosine Monophosphate Phosphodiesterase in Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 1996; 271(41): 25423 - 25429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.