Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (852K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dean, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bedbrook, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dean, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bedbrook, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1987, Vol. 15, No. 11 4655-4668
© 1987


Articles

Confirmation of the relative expression levels of the Petunia (Mitchell) rbcS genes

Caroline Dean, Mitchell Favreau, Pamela Dunsmuir and John Bedbrook

Advanced Genetic Sciences, Inc. 6701 San Pablo Ave., Oakland, CA 94608, USA

Received January 13, 1987. Revised May 7, 1987. Accepted May 7, 1987.

We have mapped the transcription start sites of three petunia rbcS genes and reassayed the relative expression levels of the petunia rbcS genes using the technique of primer extension. This analysis was performed specifically to address the confusion in the literature concerning the relative expression levels of the two petunia rbcS genes, SSU301 and SSUllA. The primer extension analysis reported here confirms our previous results, specifically that the rbcS gene, which we term SSU301, gives significantly higher levels of steady state RNA than any of the other rbcS genes in leaf tissue from 10 week old petunia plants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.