Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2501K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emoult-Lange, M.
Right arrow Articles by May, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emoult-Lange, M.
Right arrow Articles by May, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1987, Vol. 15, No. 20 8177-8193
© 1987


Articles

Contribution of different GC-motifs to the control of simian virus 40 late promoter activity

Michèle Emoult-Lange, Francis Omilli and Evelyne May*

Laboratoire d'Oncologie Moléculaire, Institut de Recherches Scientifiques sur le Cancer B P No.8, 94802 Villejuif Cedex, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received August 14, 1987. Revised September 25, 1987. Accepted September 25, 1987.

During the course of lytic infection the 21-bp repeat region regulates differentially the late gene expression; a mutant deleted for this region expresses late genes either to a higher level in the absence of T antigen or to a lower level in the late phase of infection as compared to wild type (23). By analysing a series of clustered point mutations generated within the GC-motifs we show that i) mutations within motifs I and II stimulate late transcription two to three-fold, suggesting that competition for transcription machinery between early-early and late promoters is mediated by these two motifs, ii) after viral replication, simultaneous mutations within motifs IV, V and VI decrease to 23 % the efficiency of late transcription, indicating that these motifs are elements of the late promoter. Moreover comparison of results presented in this paper with results published by Barrera-Saldana et al. strongly suggest that late-early and late promoters are regulated in a similar manner.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.