Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (594K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mosbaugh, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mosbaugh, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1988, Vol. 16, No. 12 5645-5659
© 1988


Articles

Purification and characterization of porcine liver DNA polymerase {gamma}: utilitzation of dUTP and dTTP during in vitro DNA synthesis

Dale W. Mosbaugh

Clayton Foundation Biochemical Institute and Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas Austin, TX 78712, USA

Received March 11, 1988. Revised May 16, 1988. Accepted May 16, 1988.

Porcine liver DNA polymerase {gamma} has been demonstrated to preferentially incorporate dTMP over dUMP during in vitro DNA synthesis. When polymerase activity was measured in standard reactions containing saturating levels of either dTTP or dUTP, the polymerization rate was slightly faster in the reaction containing dTTP. However, under conditions where both dTTP and dUTP competed, at an equal molar concentration, approximately 3-times more thymine residues were incorporated than uracil residues into DNA. Similarly, preferential incorporation of dTMP was observed on several substrates including poly (dA)•oligo p(dT), poly (rA)•oligo p(dT) and poly (dA-dT). The discrimination against dUMP incorporation was even more apparent with reduced levels of dUTP. These observations were consistent with the finding that the Km for DNA polymerase {gamma} was about 3-fold lower for dTTP (0.4 µM) than for dUTP (1.1 µM). On the other hand, the Vmax for these two reactions was very similar. Discrimination against dUMP incorporation was also observed during inhibition of polymerase µ by dideoxyribo-nucleoside triphosphates. Dideoxythymidine triphosphate preferentially inhibited dUMP incorporation compared to that of dTMP, whereas ddATP, ddCTP and ddGTP inhibited both reactions equally.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Guillet, P. A. Van Der Kemp, and S. Boiteux
dUTPase activity is critical to maintain genetic stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(7): 2056 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Kraltcheva and S. Hardin
Octamer-primed sequencing technology: effects of dNTP supplementation
Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2001; 29(10): e48 - e48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. E. Lim, M. J. Longley, and W. C. Copeland
The Mitochondrial p55 Accessory Subunit of Human DNA Polymerase gamma Enhances DNA Binding, Promotes Processive DNA Synthesis, and Confers N-Ethylmaleimide Resistance
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 1999; 274(53): 38197 - 38203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. K. Naviaux, D. Markusic, B. A. Barshop, W. L. Nyhan, and R. H. Haas
Sensitive Assay for Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase {gamma}
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1999; 45(10): 1725 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Eriksson, B. Xu, and D. A. Clayton
Efficient Incorporation of Anti-HIV Deoxynucleotides by Recombinant Yeast Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 1995; 270(32): 18929 - 18934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Johnson and K. A. Johnson
Fidelity of Nucleotide Incorporation by Human Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem., October 5, 2001; 276(41): 38090 - 38096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.