Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1342K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birkenbihl, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vielmetter, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birkenbihl, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vielmetter, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 13 5057-5070
© 1989

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Cosmid-derived map of E.coli strain BHB2600 in comparison to the map of strain W3110

Rainer P. Birkenbihl and Walter Vielmetter

Institut fur Genetik der UniversitüT zu Koln Weyertal 121, D-5000 K81n 41, FRG

Received April 7, 1989. Revised June 12, 1989. Accepted June 12, 1989.

A physical map for the genome of E. coli K12 strain BHB2600 was constructed by use of 570 cloned DNA elements (CDEs) withdrawn from a cosmid library. Dot blot hybridisation was applied to establish contig interrelations with subsequent fine mapping achieved by analysis of EcoRl restriction patterns on Southern blots. The derived map covers nearly 95% of the E.coli genome resulting in 12 minor gaps. It may be compared to the almost complete map for strain W3110 of Kohara et al. (1). Except for one tiny gap (lpp,36.5') remaining gaps in BHB26OO do not coincide with those in W3110 so that both maps complement each other establishing an essentially complete clone represented map. Besides numerous minute differences (site and fragment gains and losses) bom strains harbour at differing positions extended rearrangements flanked by mutually inverted repetitive elements, in our case insertion elements (IS1 and IS5).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DNA ResHome page
M. Kitagawa, T. Ara, M. Arifuzzaman, T. Ioka-Nakamichi, E. Inamoto, H. Toyonaga, and H. Mori
Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A Complete Set of E. coli K-12 ORF Archive): Unique Resources for Biological Research
DNA Res, January 1, 2005; 12(5): 291 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
P. Le Bourgeois, M.-L. Daveran-Mingot, and P. Ritzenthaler
Genome Plasticity among Related Lactococcus Strains: Identification of Genetic Events Associated with Macrorestriction Polymorphisms
J. Bacteriol., May 1, 2000; 182(9): 2481 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
M.-L. Daveran-Mingot, N. Campo, P. Ritzenthaler, and P. Le Bourgeois
A Natural Large Chromosomal Inversion in Lactococcus lactis Is Mediated by Homologous Recombination between Two Insertion Sequences
J. Bacteriol., September 15, 1998; 180(18): 4834 - 4842.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Genes Dev.Home page
R Lange and R Hengge-Aronis
The cellular concentration of the sigma S subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli is controlled at the levels of transcription, translation, and protein stability.
Genes & Dev., July 1, 1994; 8(13): 1600 - 1612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.