Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2484K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rachal, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lapeyre, J.-N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rachal, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lapeyre, J.-N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 13 5135-5148
© 1989


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

In vitro DNA cytosine roethytation of cis-regulatory elements modulates c-Ha-ras promoter activity in vivo

Mack J. Rachal, Heahyun Yoo, Frederick F. Becker and Jean-Numa Lapeyre*

Department of Molecular Pathology, Section of Experimental Pathology, The University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA

*To whom corresspondance to be addressed

Received March 1, 1989. Revised June 4, 1989. Accepted June 1, 1989.

The effect of DNA cytosine methylation on promoter activity was assessed using a transient expression system employing pHrasCAT. This 551 bp Ha-ras-1 gene promoter region is enriched with 84 CpG dinucleotides, six functional GC boxes, and is prototypic of many genes possessing CpG islands in their promoter regions. Bacteria] modification enzymes Hhal methyl transferase (MTase) and Hpall MTase, alone or in combination with a human placenta] DNA methyltransferase (HP MTase) that methylates CpG sites in a generalized manner, including asymmetric elements such as GC box CpG's, were used to methylate at different types of sites in the promoter. Methylation of Hhal and Hpall sites reduced CAT expression by –70% –80%, whereas methylation at generalized CpG sites with HP MTase inactivated the promoter by <95%. The inhibition of H-ras promoter activity was not attributable to methylation-induced differences in DNA uptake or stability in the cell, topological form of the plasmid, or methylation effects in non-promoter regions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
K. Akimoto, H. Katakami, H.-J. Kim, E. Ogawa, C. M. Sano, Y. Wada, and H. Sano
Epigenetic Inheritance in Rice Plants
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 205 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Muthukkumar, S.-S. Han, S. Muthukkumar, V. M. Rangnekar, and S. Bondada
Role of Egr-1 Gene Expression in B Cell Receptor-induced Apoptosis in an Immature B Cell Lymphoma
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 1997; 272(44): 27987 - 27993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.