Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2879K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, M. S.Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horwitz, M. S.Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 14 5537-5546
© 1989


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Transcription regulation in vitro by an E.coli promoter containing a DNA cruciform in the ’-35‘ region

Marshall S.Z. Horwitz

The Joseph Gottstein Memorial Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, SM-30, School of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 USA

Received April 10, 1989. Revised June 12, 1989. Accepted June 12, 1989.

A promoter with the potential to adopt a 50 basepair (bp) cruciform spanning from –19 to –69 has been constructed in the plasmid pBR322 tetracycline resistance gene (tei) by forming an inverted repeat from ’–35‘ sequences. Compared to a control promoter, the sequence of this cruciform promoter differs only by a 22 bp insertion between –48 and –69, upstream from the usual location of promoter sequences. The cruciform is extruded in a supercoil-dependent manner, and transcription from this promoter in vitro by RNA polymerase decreases as the negative supercoil density of the plasmid DNA increases. In contrast, transcription from the control promoter increases with negative supercoiling. Thus, DNA secondary structure in the ’–35‘ region can affect promoter-polymerase interaction. The tet promoter cruciform also influences expression of the pBR322 ß-lactamase gene (bid). This apparently results when extrusion of the cruciform reduces the superhelicity of the plasmid molecule to a level that is below the optimum for expression from the bla promoter, illustrating one mechanism for how DNA secondary structure may effect action-at-a-distance. Transcription from both promoters in vivo does not differ from controls, suggesting that this cruciform is not generated to a significant extent intracellularly, most probably as a result of the slow kinetics of extrusion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Rangan, O. Yu. Fedoroff, and L. H. Hurley
Induction of Duplex to G-quadruplex Transition in the c-myc Promoter Region by a Small Molecule
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2001; 276(7): 4640 - 4646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.