Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (902K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (171)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eberle, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eberle, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 2 477-498
© 1989


SURVEY AND SUMMARY

Codon usage in plant genes

Elizabeth E. Murray1,2, Jeff Lotzer1 and Mary Eberle1

1Agrigenetics Advanced Sciences Company 5649 East Buckeye Road, Madison, Wl 53713 2McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI 53706, USA

Received October 6, 1988. Accepted December 14, 1988.

We have examined codon bias in 207 plant gene sequences collected from Genbank and the literature. When this sample was further divided into 53 monocot and 154 dicot genes, the pattern of relative use of synonymous codons was shown to differ between these taxonomic groups, primarily in the use of G+C in the degenerate third base. Maize and soybean codon bias were examined separately and followed the monocot and dicot codon usage patterns respectively. Codon preference in ribulose 1, 5 bisphosphate and chlorophyll a/b binding protein, two of the most abundant proteins in leaves was investigated. These highly expressed are more restricted in their codon usage than plant genes in general.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
F. S. Walters, C. M. Stacy, M. K. Lee, N. Palekar, and J. S. Chen
An Engineered Chymotrypsin/Cathepsin G Site in Domain I Renders Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A Active against Western Corn Rootworm Larvae
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 15, 2008; 74(2): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. L. Christianson
Codon usage patterns distort phylogenies from or of DNA sequences
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2005; 92(8): 1221 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Yang, G. C. Fox Jr., and T. V. Henry-Smith
Intein-mediated assembly of a functional beta -glucuronidase in transgenic plants
PNAS, March 18, 2003; 100(6): 3513 - 3518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. P. Dias, E. L. Braun, M. D. McMullen, and E. Grotewold
Recently Duplicated Maize R2R3 Myb Genes Provide Evidence for Distinct Mechanisms of Evolutionary Divergence after Duplication
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2003; 131(2): 610 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. V. Sawant, K. Kiran, P. K. Singh, and R. Tuli
Sequence Architecture Downstream of the Initiator Codon Enhances Gene Expression and Protein Stability in Plants
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2001; 126(4): 1630 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. De Amicis and S. Marchetti
Intercodon dinucleotides affect codon choice in plant genes
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2000; 28(17): 3339 - 3345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. D. Rabinowicz, E. L. Braun, A. D. Wolfe, B. Bowen, and E. Grotewold
Maize R2R3 Myb Genes: Sequence Analysis Reveals Amplification in the Higher Plants
Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 427 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.