Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (5517K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolffe, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolffe, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 2 767-780
© 1989


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Transcriptional activation of Xenopus class III genes in chromatin isolated from sperm and somatic nuclei

Alan P. Wolffe

Laboratory of Molecular Biology Building 6, Rm 131, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

Received July 22, 1988. Revised December 20, 1988. Accepted December 20, 1988.

Xenopus sperm chromatin lacks class III transcription complexes and somatic histone HI. Inactive class III genes in sperm chromatin are easily programmed with transcription complexes de novo and transcribed in Xenopus oocyte nuclear extract. In contrast, repressed class III genes in somatic chromatin are not transcribed in the oocyte nuclear extract. Class III genes that are initially inactive or repressed in both types of chromatin can be efficiently transcribed in a cell free preparation of Xenopus eggs. Chromatin mediated repression of class III genes in somatic nuclei is reversible in Xenopus egg extract, but not in the oocyte nuclear extract. Any inhibition of transcription attributed to chromatin assembly onto a gene, will therefore depend on the extract in which transcription is assayed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
N Kikyo and A. Wolffe
Reprogramming nuclei: insights from cloning, nuclear transfer and heterokaryons
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2000; 113(1): 11 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
Z. H. Lu, H. Xu, and G. H. Leno
DNA Replication in Quiescent Cell Nuclei: Regulation by the Nuclear Envelope and Chromatin Structure
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 1999; 10(12): 4091 - 4106.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Tse, T. Sera, A. P. Wolffe, and J. C. Hansen
Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 1998; 18(8): 4629 - 4638.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. P. Nightingale, D. Pruss, and A. P. Wolffe
A Single High Affinity Binding Site for Histone H1 in a Nucleosome Containing the Xenopus borealis 5 S Ribosomal RNA Gene
J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 1996; 271(12): 7090 - 7094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P Bouvet, S Dimitrov, and A P Wolffe
Specific regulation of Xenopus chromosomal 5S rRNA gene transcription in vivo by histone H1.
Genes & Dev., May 15, 1994; 8(10): 1147 - 1159.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.