Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1249K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heuchel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heuchel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1989, Vol. 17, No. 22 8931-8947
© 1989

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Two closely spaced promoters are equally activated by a remote enhancer: evidence against a scanning model for enhancer action

Rainer Heuchel, Patrick Matthis* and Walter Schaffner

Institute für Molekularbiologie II der Universität Zürich CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Received September 20, 1989. Revised October 23, 1989. Accepted October 23, 1989.

To explain the activation of transcription by a remote enhancer, two models are most often considered, namely looping and scanning. A scanning model, also referred to as ‘polymerase entry site’ model predicts that for two adjacent promoters the one proximal to an enhancer would be preferentially activated. Preferential activation of the proximal promoter in a tandem promoter arrangement has been found before in several laboratories, including our own, but for technical reasons the data were inconclusive with regards to the enhancer mechanism. In the work presented here, we readdress the question of preferential promoter activation by an enhancer using a more clearly defined system. Two identical promoters were kept closeby in a divergent, or directly repeated orientation. The SV40 enhancer was placed at a great distance on one or the other side of the two promoters, to see whether the enhancer position influenced the relative efficiency of the two promoters in transfected cells. Our finding that the promoter usage is virtually unaffected by the enhancer position does not favor a scanning model, but is compatible with a looping model of enhancer action.

* Present address: Whitebead Institute for Biomedical Researeh, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Wei and M. D. Brennan
Polarity of transcriptional enhancement revealed by an insulator element
PNAS, December 8, 2000; (2000) 11529598.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Wei and M. D. Brennan
Polarity of transcriptional enhancement revealed by an insulator element
PNAS, December 19, 2000; 97(26): 14518 - 14523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.