Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2102K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (85)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Covello, P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Covello, P.S.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M.W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1990, Vol. 18, No. 17 5189-5196
© 1990


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Differences in editing at homologous sites in messenger RNAs from angiosperm mitochondria

P.S. Covello and M.W. Gray

Department of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4H7, Canada

Received May 14, 1990. Revised July 16, 1990. Accepted July 16, 1990.

Recent work has shown that amino acid sequence comparisons can be used to infer sites of C-to-U RNA editing in plant mitochondrial mRNAs (1). In order to test such predictions further and to search for conserved mRNA structural motifs that might provide insight into the mechanism of recognition of editing sites, the complete sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COXII) mRNAs of wheat, maize and pea were determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing. The results affirm the high reliability of editing predictions based on amino acid sequence alignments, and prompt us to make the further inference that COXI (cytochrome oxidase subunit I) mRNA is extensively edited in dicotyledonous plants but not in monocotyledons. In plant COXII mRNAs, additional non-predicted editing occurs such that the resulting derived amino acid sequences are more similar to those of non-plants than is indicated by the respective plant COXII DNA sequences. A number of homologous sites show differences in editing among species, and certain positions show partial editing within a species. Despite some deviation from expected nucleotide frequencies in the vicinity of editing sites, no extensive conserved primary or secondary structural motifs are apparent. The relevance of these data to the mechanism of RNA editing in plant mitochondria is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Kuhn and S. Binder
RT-PCR analysis of 5' to 3'-end-ligated mRNAs identifies the extremities of cox2 transcripts in pea mitochondria
Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2002; 30(2): 439 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J.-C. Farre, G. Leon, X. Jordana, and A. Araya
cis Recognition Elements in Plant Mitochondrion RNA Editing
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 6731 - 6737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-C. Farre and A. Araya
Gene expression in isolated plant mitochondria: high fidelity of transcription, splicing and editing of a transgene product in electroporated organelles
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2001; 29(12): 2484 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. Mackenzie and L. McIntosh
Higher Plant Mitochondria
PLANT CELL, April 1, 1999; 11(4): 571 - 586.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Yu and W. Schuster
Evidence for a Site-specific Cytidine Deamination Reaction Involved in C to U RNA Editing of Plant Mitochondria
J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 1995; 270(31): 18227 - 18233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Lonergan and M. Gray
Editing of transfer RNAs in Acanthamoeba castellanii mitochondria
Science, February 5, 1993; 259(5096): 812 - 816.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.