Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (6303K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1990, Vol. 18, No. 23 7007-7014
© 1990


Articles

Structural organization and differential expression of rice {alpha}-amylase genes

Ning Huang, Nozomu Koizumi+, Stephen Reinl and Raymond L. Rodriguez*

Department of Genetics, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received July 30, 1990. Revised September 28, 1990. Accepted September 28, 1990.

Rice {alpha}-amylases are encoded by a multigene family that has previously been classified into 5 hybridization groups. DNA sequence and Southern blot analysis identified three genes (RAmy1A, RAmy1B and RAmy1C) in Group 1 with DNA sequence identity of at least 90%. Hybridization Group 2 is represented by only one gene, RAmy3D, which is identical to a previously characterized cDNA, pOS137. RAmy3D is physically linked to the sole representative of Group 5, RAmy3E. The identity between these two genes is 81.4% in the coding region but less than 50% in the 5' and 3' flanking regions. Northern blot analysis and RNA-PCR were used to detect the expression of {alpha}-amylase genes in various tissues. Alpha-amylase mRNA was abundant in germinating seeds and callus. Some genes were also expressed at much lower levels in roots, young leaves and immature seeds. RAmy1A and RAmy3E were expressed in all tissues while RAmy3D was expressed in all tissues except the immature seeds. RAmy1B was weakly expressed only in callus. RAmy1A transcript was most abundant in the germinating seeds, while RAmy3D and RAmy3E transcripts were most abundant in callus and immature seeds, respectively.


+Present address: Research Center for Cell and Tissue Culture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Z.-L. Zhang, Z. Xie, X. Zou, J. Casaretto, T.-h. D. Ho, and Q. J. Shen
A Rice WRKY Gene Encodes a Transcriptional Repressor of the Gibberellin Signaling Pathway in Aleurone Cells
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2004; 134(4): 1500 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. LORETI, J. YAMAGUCHI, A. ALPI, and P. PERATA
Sugar Modulation of {alpha}-Amylase Genes under Anoxia
Ann. Bot., January 2, 2003; 91(2): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ueguchi-Tanaka, Y. Fujisawa, M. Kobayashi, M. Ashikari, Y. Iwasaki, H. Kitano, and M. Matsuoka
Rice dwarf mutant d1, which is defective in the alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein, affects gibberellin signal transduction
PNAS, October 10, 2000; 97(21): 11638 - 11643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-A. Lu, E.-K. Lim, and S.-M. Yu
Sugar Response Sequence in the Promoter of a Rice alpha -Amylase Gene Serves as a Transcriptional Enhancer
J. Biol. Chem., April 24, 1998; 273(17): 10120 - 10131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-J. Sheu, T.-S. Yu, W.-F. Tong, and S.-M. Yu
Carbohydrate Starvation Stimulates Differential Expression of Rice alpha -Amylase Genes That Is Modulated through Complicated Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Processes
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 1996; 271(43): 26998 - 27004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.