Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (7012K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ach, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ach, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, Vol. 19, No. 15 4209-4218
© 1991


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Cooperation between CCAAT and octamer motifs in the distal sequence element of the rat U3 small nucleolar RNA promoter

Robert A. Ach+ and Alan M. Weiner*

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA

ast;To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received April 1, 1991. Revised July 1, 1991. Accepted July 1, 1991.

Mammalian U3 small nucleolar RNA promoters possess a highly conserved distal sequence element (DSE) consisting of CCAAT and octamer motifs separated by 11 – 12 base pairs. We show here that both motifs are required for transcription of a rat U3D gene in Xenopus occytes. Deletion of the CCAAT motif leaves residual DSE activity, while removal of the octamer motif does not. Changing the conserved spacing between the two motifs generally inhibits transcription less than deletion of either motif, but increasing the spacing between the motifs by one helical turn of DNA preserves normal levels of transcription. We also show that the rat U3D DSE is functionally equivalent to the human U2 snRNA DSE, which consists of adjacent GC and octamer motifs, and that elements from the Herpes Simplex Virus thymidine kinase promoter can replace part or all of the U3D DSE. These data are apparently paradoxical; despite high evolutionary conservation, the U3 DSE is relatively insensitive to mutation, and other upstream motifs are also able to drive transcription from the U3 basal promoter. We suggest that the conserved structure of the U3 DSE may be required for regulation rather than efficiency of U3 transcription.


+Present address: Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. S. Bhathal, Z. Zamrod, T. Tobaru, and W. E. Stumph
Identification of Proximal Sequence Element Nucleotides Contributing to the Differential Expression of Variant U4 Small Nuclear RNA Genes
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 1995; 270(46): 27629 - 27633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S J Baserga, M Gilmore-Hebert, and X W Yang
Distinct molecular signals for nuclear import of the nucleolar snRNA, U3.
Genes & Dev., June 1, 1992; 6(6): 1120 - 1130.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.