Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (3664K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slupphaug, G.
Right arrow Articles by Krokan, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slupphaug, G.
Right arrow Articles by Krokan, H. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, Vol. 19, No. 19 5131-5137
© 1991


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Cell cycle regulation and in vitro hybrid arrest analysis of the major human uracil-DNA glycosylase

Geir Slupphaug, Lisbeth C. OIsen1, Dag Helland1, Rein Aasland1 and Hans E. Krokan*

UNIGEN Center for Molecular Bioloy, University of Trondheim N–7005 Trondheim 1Laboratory of Biotechnology, University of Bergen HiB, N–5020 Bergen, Norway

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received August 23, 1991. Accepted September 16, 1991.

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is the first enzyme in the excision repair pathway for removal of uracil In DNA. In vitro transcription/translation of a cloned human cDNA encoding UDG resulted in easily measurable UDG activity. The apparent size of the primary translation product was 34 kD. Two lines of evidence indicated that this cDNA encodes the major nuclear UDG. First, In vitro translation of human fibroblast mRNA isolated from S-phase cells resulted In measurable UDG activity and this UDG translation was specifically inhibited 90% by an anti-sense UDG mRNA transcript. Secondly, cell cycle analysis revealed an 8–12 fold Increase in transcript level late in the G1-phase preceding a 2 – 3 fold increase in total UDG activity in the S-phase. UDG degradation was found to be very slow (T1/2 = 30h), therefore, the rate of UDG synthesis could be derived from the rate of UDG accumulation, and was found to correlate temporarily and quantitatively with the transcript level. Inhibitor studies showed that RNA and protein synthesis was required for induction of UDG. However, specific inhibition of DNA replication with aphldlcolin indicated that entrance of fibroblasts into the S-phase was not required for UDG accumulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. S. Pettersen, O. Sundheim, K. M. Gilljam, G. Slupphaug, H. E. Krokan, and B. Kavli
Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms
Nucleic Acids Res., June 9, 2007; 35(12): 3879 - 3892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C.-C. Lu, H.-T. Huang, J.-T. Wang, G. Slupphaug, T.-K. Li, M.-C. Wu, Y.-C. Chen, C.-P. Lee, and M.-R. Chen
Characterization of the Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Activity of Epstein-Barr Virus BKRF3 and Its Role in Lytic Viral DNA Replication
J. Virol., February 1, 2007; 81(3): 1195 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. I. Kruman, E. Schwartz, Y. Kruman, R. G. Cutler, X. Zhu, N. H. Greig, and M. P. Mattson
Suppression of Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Induces Neuronal Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43952 - 43960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Kavli, O. Sundheim, M. Akbari, M. Otterlei, H. Nilsen, F. Skorpen, P. A. Aas, L. Hagen, H. E. Krokan, and G. Slupphaug
hUNG2 Is the Major Repair Enzyme for Removal of Uracil from U:A Matches, U:G Mismatches, and U in Single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a Broad Specificity Backup
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39926 - 39936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. T. Courcelle, J. Courcelle, M. N. Prichard, and E. S. Mocarski
Requirement for Uracil-DNA Glycosylase during the Transition to Late-Phase Cytomegalovirus DNA Replication
J. Virol., August 15, 2001; 75(16): 7592 - 7601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Nilsen and H. E. Krokan
Base excision repair in a network of defence and tolerance
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2001; 22(7): 987 - 998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Nilsen, K. S. Steinsbekk, M. Otterlei, G. Slupphaug, P. A. Aas, and H. E. Krokan
Analysis of uracil-DNA glycosylases from the murine Ung gene reveals differential expression in tissues and in embryonic development and a subcellular sorting pattern that differs from the human homologues
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2000; 28(12): 2277 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. L. Shinohara, J. J. Loros, and J. C. Dunlap
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase Is Regulated on a Daily Basis by the Circadian Clock
J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 1998; 273(1): 446 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. A. Nagelhus, T. Haug, K. K. Singh, K. F. Keshav, F. Skorpen, M. Otterlei, S. Bharati, T. Lindmo, S. Benichou, R. Benarous, et al.
A Sequence in the N-terminal Region of Human Uracil-DNA Glycosylase with Homology to XPA Interacts with the C-terminal Part of the 34-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 1997; 272(10): 6561 - 6566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Handa, N. Acharya, and U. Varshney
Chimeras between Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins from Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveal That Their C-terminal Domains Interact with Uracil DNA Glycosylases
J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2001; 276(20): 16992 - 16997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.