Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (5275K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lettmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doerfler, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lettmann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doerfler, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, Vol. 19, No. 25 7131-7137
© 1991


Foreword

Persistence or loss of preimposed nethylation patterns and de novo methylation of foreign DNA integrated in transgenic mice

Clarissa Lettmann, Birgit Schmitz and Walter Doerfler*

Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne Weyertal 121, D-5000, Cologne 41, FRG

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

In cultured mammalian cells, foreign DNA can be integrated Into the host genome. Foreign DNA is frequently de novo methylated In specific patterns with successive cell generations. The sequence-specific methylation of promoter sequences in integrated foreign DNA is associated with the long-term inactivation of eukaryotic genes. We have now extended these experiments to studies on transgenic mice. As in previous work, a construct (pAd2E2ALCAT) has been used which consists of the late E2A promoter of adenovlrus type 2 (Ad2) DNA fused to the prokaryotic gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). This construct has been integrated In the nonmethylated or in the 5'-CCGG-3' premefhylated form in the genomes of transgenic mice. DNA from various organs was analyzed by Hpall/Mspl cleavage to assess the state of methylation in 5'-CCGG-3' sequences. The results demonstrate that the transgenic construct is in general stable. Non-methylated constructs have remained partly non-methylated for four generations or can become de novo methylated at all or most 5'-CCGG-3' sequences in the founder animal. Preimposed patterns of 5'-CCGG-3' methylafion have been preserved for up to four generations beyond the founder animal. In the testes of two different founder animals and two F1 males, the transgenic DNA has become demethylated by an unknown mechanism. In all other organs, the transgenic DNA preserves the preimposed 5'-CCGG-3' methylation pattern. In the experiments performed so far we have not observed differences in the transmission of methylation patterns depending on whether the transgene has been maternally or paternally inherited. The 5'-CCGG-3' premethylated transgene does not catalyze CAT activity in several organs, except in one example of the testes of an animal in which the transgenic construct has become demethylated. In contrast, when the nonmethylated construct has been integrated and remained largely non-methylated, CAT activity has been defected in extracts from some of the organs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Schumacher, P. A. Koetsier, J. Hertz, and W. Doerfler
Epigenetic and Genotype-specific Effects on the Stability of de Novo Imposed Methylation Patterns in Transgenic Mice
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2000; 275(48): 37915 - 37921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Muller, H. Heller, and W. Doerfler
Foreign DNA Integration. GENOME-WIDE PERTURBATIONS OF METHYLATION AND TRANSCRIPTION IN THE RECIPIENT GENOMES
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2001; 276(17): 14271 - 14278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.