Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (8992K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackrill, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ackrill, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, I. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, Vol. 19, No. 3 591-598
© 1991


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Differential response of the human 6–16 and 9–27 genes to {alpha} and {gamma} interferons

Andrew M. Ackrill, Laurence E. Reid+, Christopher S. Gilbert, Dirk R. Gewert§, Andrew C.G. Porterø, Andrew R. Lewin, George R. Stark and Ian M. Kerr*

Imperial Cancer Research Fund PO Box 123, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received October 1, 1991. Revised January 7, 1990. Accepted January 7, 1990.

9–27 mRNA is expressed to a high level in response to both {alpha} and {gamma} interferons. In contrast, 6–16 mRNA Is expressed well in response to {alpha} but very poorly in response to {gamma} interferon in human cells. The factors governing these different levels of expression were investigated. For both genes the major effect of both interferons is on transcription. A transcriptional bias in the 6–16 promoter/enhancer accounts in large part for the differential response of 6–16 to the two interferons. No single DNA element appears responsible; the smaller the 5' region analysed the lower the absolute activity and the smaller the differential response to {alpha} and {gamma} interferons observed. Both the 6–16 and 9–27 mRNAs are very stable and no effect of the interferons on stability was detected. Nor was any direct evidence obtained for preferential processing of the 9–27 mRNA. Nevertheless, differentials between the transcription and accumulation of mature mRNAs, particularly for 6–16 mRNA in response to {gamma} interferon, suggest that post-transcriptional controls) must additionally operate. The 9–27 5' promoter/enhancer Is much less active than that from 6–16 when placed 5' of a marker gene, despite the similar response of the two genes to a interferon.


+Present addresses: Editorial Office, Cell, 50 Church Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

§Wellcome Biotech, Langley Court, Beckenham BR3 3BS, Kent

øBiochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QU, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. R. S. Rani, C. Gauzzi, S. Pellegrini, E. N. Fish, T. Wei, and R. M. Ransohoff
Induction of beta -R1/I-TAC by Interferon-beta Requires Catalytically Active TYK2
J. Biol. Chem., January 22, 1999; 274(4): 1891 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. D. Der, A. Zhou, B. R. G. Williams, and R. H. Silverman
Identification of genes differentially regulated by interferon alpha , beta , or gamma  using oligonucleotide arrays
PNAS, December 22, 1998; 95(26): 15623 - 15628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.R. S. Rani, G. R. Foster, S. Leung, D. Leaman, G. R. Stark, and R. M. Ransohoff
Characterization of beta -R1, a Gene That Is Selectively Induced by Interferon beta (IFN-beta ) Compared with IFN-alpha
J. Biol. Chem., September 13, 1996; 271(37): 22878 - 22884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.