Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (628K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, Vol. 20, No. 13 3471-3477
© 1992


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Escherichia coli promoters: neural networks develop distinct descriptions in learning to search for promoters of different spacing classes

Michael C. O'Neill

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland - Baltimore County Baltimore, MD 21228, USA

Received February 10, 1992. Revised June 1, 1992. Accepted June 1, 1992.

Back-propagation neural networks were trained to recognize promoter sequences of each of the three major spacing classes found in E.coli. These networks were trained with the object of maximizing their ability to generalize while maintaining the level of false positive identifications at a fraction of 1 percent. These objectives were generally met. Networks for the 16 base spacing class captured between 78 and 100% of previously unseen promoters in different tests; networks for the 17 base class identified 97% of the test promoters; networks for the 18 base class identified 79% of the test promoters. A tandem poll of networks for all three spacing classes produced a cumulative false positive level of less than 0.5%. In each case, the weight matrices used by the networks in their classification were analyzed to determine the relative weight assigned to the occurrence of a given base at a given position within the promoter. In this fashion, an approximate description of the network's definition of the promoter can be obtained.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Mann, J. Li, and Y.-P. P. Chen
A pHMM-ANN based discriminative approach to promoter identification in prokaryote genomic contexts
Nucleic Acids Res., January 28, 2007; 35(2): e12 - e12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. C. O'Neill
A general procedure for locating and analyzing protein-binding sequence motifs in nucleic acids
PNAS, September 1, 1998; 95(18): 10710 - 10715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.