Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, Vol. 20, No. 23 6189-6194
© 1992
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY |
Identification of editing positions in the ndhB transcript from maize chloroplasts reveals sequence similarities between editing sites of chloroplasts and plant mitochondria
Institut für Biologie III, Universität Freiburg Schänzle-Strasse 1, D-7800 Freiburg, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
Received October 12, 1992. Accepted November 9, 1992.
A comparison of the nucleotide sequences from genomic DNA and cDNA of the ndhB gene from maize chloroplasts shows that the ndhB transcript is edited by C-to-U transitions at six positions which appear to exist as editing sites also in the chloroplast ndhB genes from rice and tobacco but not from liverwort. In order to identity possible sequence determinants necessary for editing, the sequences surrounding the newly identified ndhB and previously identified ndhA editing sites were compared with each other and with editing sites observed in plant mitochondrial transcripts. Among the chloroplast editing sites two closely positioned ndhB sites show similarity by sharing a common octanucleotide. The existence of the identical octanucleotide in the ndhJ gene whose transcript is not edited at the respective position, shows, however, that this octanucleotide is not sufficient to elicit the editing process. On the other hand, several of the chloroplast editing sites show sequence similarities with certain sets of consensus sequences reported earlier for editing sites of plant mitochondria. This supports the view that the editing processes of both plant organelles share common components and/or mechanistic steps and that the consensus sequences are part of the determinants necessary for editing.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kahlau and R. Bock Plastid Transcriptomics and Translatomics of Tomato Fruit Development and Chloroplast-to-Chromoplast Differentiation: Chromoplast Gene Expression Largely Serves the Production of a Single Protein PLANT CELL, April 1, 2008; 20(4): 856 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Karcher, S. Kahlau, and R. Bock Faithful editing of a tomato-specific mRNA editing site in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts RNA, February 1, 2008; 14(2): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bolle, I. Hinrichsen, and F. Kempken Plastid mRNAs are neither spliced nor edited in maize and cauliflower mitochondrial in organello systems RNA, December 1, 2007; 13(12): 2061 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fiebig, S. Stegemann, and R. Bock Rapid evolution of RNA editing sites in a small non-essential plastid gene Nucleic Acids Res., July 7, 2004; 32(12): 3615 - 3622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hermann and R. Bock Transfer of plastid RNA-editing activity to novel sites suggests a critical role for spacing in editing-site recognition PNAS, April 27, 1999; 96(9): 4856 - 4861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Freyer, M.-C. Kiefer-Meyer, and H. Kossel Occurrence of plastid RNA editing in all major lineages of land plants PNAS, June 10, 1997; 94(12): 6285 - 6290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



