Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2264K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peleg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peleg, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1993, Vol. 21, No. 23 5360-5365
© 1993


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Modified binding of proteins from calcitonin-negative tumor cells to the neuroendocrine-specific CANNTG motif of the calcitonin gene

Sara Peleg

Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, The University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Received September 1, 1993. Revised October 11, 1993. Accepted October 11, 1993.

Transcription of the calcitonin (CT) gene in the medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) cell line TT is modulated by a neuroendocrine-specific enhancer fragment (nucleotides - 965 to - 905) containing two CANNTG motifs (E2 and E3) and an Ets-like response element. To determine the cell-specific component of this fragment, oligonucleotides containing the individual elements were inserted in front of a minimal CT promoter and tested for reporter protein production in CT-positive (TT) and -negative (RO-D81 and HeLa) cells. In TT cells, using two copies of E2 or four copies of Ets increased minimal promoter activity a 20–40 fold. Using two copies of E3 had no effect on minimal promoter activity. In CT-negative MTC cells (RO-D81), the Ets response element was active but the two copies of E2 were not. Similar results were obtained with the non-neuroendocrine cell-line HeLa. I therefore concluded that E2 was the cell-type-specific component of the enhancer. An E2-specific binding protein was detected in both MTC cell lines but not in HeLa. This protein had different mobility and DNAbinding specificity in CT-positive TT cells and CTnegative RO-D81 cells. In conclusion, the CAGCTG motif of E2 modulated the cell-specific transcription of the CT gene, and its inactivation in CT-negative MTC cells correlated with modifications in its binding proteins.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.