Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (2182K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pleij, C. W.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pleij, C. W.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1993, Vol. 21, No. 3 401-406
© 1993


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Differential response to frameshift signals in eukaryotic and prokaryotic translational systems

Angela Garcia+, Jan van Duin and Cornelis W.A. Pleij*

Department of Biochemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories Leiden University, PC Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received November 20, 1992. Accepted December 21, 1992.

The genomic RNA of beet western yellows virus (BWYV) contains a potential translational frameahift signal in the overlap region of open reading frames ORF2 and ORF3. The signal, composed of a heptanucleotide slippery sequence and a downstream pseudoknot, is similar in appearance to those identified in retroviral RNAs. We have examined whether the proposed BWYV signal functions in frameshifting in three translational systems, i.c. In vitro in a reticulocyte lysate or a wheat germ extract and in vivo in E.coli. The efficiency of the signal in the eukaryotic system is low but significant, as it responds strongly to changes in either the slip sequence or the pseudoknot. In contrast, in E.coli there is hardly any response to the same changes. Replacing the slip sequence to the typical prokaryotlc signal AAAAAAG yields more than 5% frameshift in E.coli. In this organism the frameshifting is highly sensitive to changes in the sup sequence but only slightly to disruption of the pseudoknot. The eukaryotic assay systems are barely sensitive to changes in either AAAAAAG or in the pseudoknot structure in this construct. We conclude that eukaryotic frameshift signals are not recognized by prokaryotes. On the other hand the typical prokaryotic slip sequence AAAAAAG does not lead to significant frameshifting in the eukaryote. In contrast to recent reports on the closely related potato ieafroll virus (PLRV) we show that the frameshifting in BWYV is pseudoknot-dependent.


+Present address: U.P.R de Cancérogénèse de Mutagénèse Moléculaire et Structurale, Institut de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, 15 rue René Descartes, 67084 Suasbourg Cedex, France


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Gendron, J. Charbonneau, D. Dulude, N. Heveker, G. Ferbeyre, and L. Brakier-Gingras
The presence of the TAR RNA structure alters the programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift efficiency of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by modifying the rate of translation initiation
Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 30 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
E. P. PLANT and J. D. DINMAN
Comparative study of the effects of heptameric slippery site composition on -1 frameshifting among different eukaryotic systems
RNA, April 1, 2006; 12(4): 666 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M.-C. Su, C.-T. Chang, C.-H. Chu, C.-H. Tsai, and K.-Y. Chang
An atypical RNA pseudoknot stimulator and an upstream attenuation signal for -1 ribosomal frameshifting of SARS coronavirus
Nucleic Acids Res., July 29, 2005; 33(13): 4265 - 4275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Makelainen and K. Makinen
Factors affecting translation at the programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting site of Cocksfoot mottle virus RNA in vivo
Nucleic Acids Res., April 20, 2005; 33(7): 2239 - 2247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. M. Jaag, L. Kawchuk, W. Rohde, R. Fischer, N. Emans, and D. Prufer
An unusual internal ribosomal entry site of inverted symmetry directs expression of a potato leafroll polerovirus replication-associated protein
PNAS, July 22, 2003; 100(15): 8939 - 8944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Egli, G. Minasov, L. Su, and A. Rich
Metal ions and flexibility in a viral RNA pseudoknot at atomic resolution
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4302 - 4307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. L. Alam, J. F. Atkins, and R. F. Gesteland
Programmed ribosomal frameshifting: Much ado about knotting!
PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14177 - 14179.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y.-G. Kim, L. Su, S. Maas, A. O'Neill, and A. Rich
From the Cover: Specific mutations in a viral RNA pseudoknot drastically change ribosomal frameshifting efficiency
PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14234 - 14239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-C. Wang and P. Schimmel
Species Barrier to RNA Recognition Overcome with Nonspecific RNA Binding Domains
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 1999; 274(23): 16508 - 16512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Egli, G. Minasov, L. Su, and A. Rich
Metal ions and flexibility in a viral RNA pseudoknot at atomic resolution
PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4302 - 4307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.