Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (659K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Drunen, C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Goosen, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Drunen, C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Goosen, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1994, Vol. 22, No. 5 773-779
© 1994


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Transposase A binding sites in the attachment sites of bacteriophage Mu that are essential for the activity of the enhancer and A binding sites that promote transposition towards Fpro-lac

C.M. van Drunen, E. Mientjes, C. van Zuylen, P. van de Putte and N. Goosen*

Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University Einsteinweg 55, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received December 8, 1993. Revised February 7, 1994. Accepted February 7, 1994.

In this paper we determine which of the A binding sites In the attachment sites of phage Mu are required for the stimulatory activity of the transpositional enhancer (IAS). For this purpose the transposition frequencies of mini-Mu's with different truncated attachment sites to an Ftet target were measured both in the presence and the absence of the IAS. The results show that in our in vivo assay the L3 and R3 sites are dispensable for functioning of the IAS. An additional deletion of L2 or R2 however abolishes the stimulating activity of the enhancer suggesting an interaction between A molecules bound to these sites and the IAS. The residual transposition activity of a IAS-containing mini Mu in which R2 (and R3) are deleted is much lower than the activity of the comparable construct without the IAS. This means that in the absence of R2 the IAS is Inhibiting transposition. Such an inhibition is not observed when L2 (and L3) are deleted. This suggests that the IAS interacts with the attachment sites In an ordered fashion, first with affL and then with attR. Furthermore we show that mini-Mu transposition is enhanced when Fpro-lac is used as a target instead of Ftet. We show that this elevated transposition Is dependent on the Mu A binding sites L2.L3 and R2. These sequences could possibly mediate an Interaction between the mlnl-Mu plasmid and sequences present on Fpro-lac.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.