Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (882K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swift, S.
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swift, S.
Right arrow Articles by McGraw, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1995, Vol. 23, No. 8 1426-1433
© 1995


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

INO1–100: an allele of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO1 gene that is transcribed without the action of the positive factors encoded by the INO2, INO4, SWI1, SWI2 and SWI3 genes

Steve Swift and Paricia McGraw*

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland (UMBC) 5401 Wilkens Avenue, Catonsville, MD 21228, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received November 14, 1994. Revised March 2, 1995. Accepted March 2, 1995.

A dominant allele of the INO1locus, INO1–100, does not require the positive regulators encoded by INO2 and INO4 for expression. Sequence analysis showed that INO1–-100 had a 239 bp deletion in the INO1 promoter. INO1–-100 suppressed the Inositol auxotrophy of Ino2, Ino4, swi1, swi2 and swi3 mutants. Transcription of INO1–100 was constitutive and independent of these regulators. A 20 bp deletion from –247 to –228 caused a similar phenotype. A 38 bp deletion from –245 to –208 suppressed the inositol auxotrophy of an ino2 mutant, but not an ino4 mutant, indicating that ino2p and lno4p may function alone as well as in a complex. A 40 bp deletion from –287 to –248 that removed a URS1 site caused constitutive transcription that required INO2 and INO4. A deletion from –167 to –128 suppressed the inositol auxotrophy of swi,ino2 and ino4 mutants, indicating the presence of a previously unidentified URS1. Mutation of the specific negative regulator of phospholipld synthesis encoded by OPI1 suppressed the inositol auxotrophy of swi2 mutants. This study indicates that negative regulation of INO1 is chromatin mediated and provides in vivo information on the interaction of both general and specific regulatory factors that function to accomplish negative and positive regulation of the INO1 promoter in response to inositol.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. C. Hancock, R. P. Behta, and J. M. Lopes
Genomic Analysis of the Opi- Phenotype
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 621 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. A. Robinson, J. I. Koepke, M. Kharodawala, and J. M. Lopes
A network of yeast basic helix-loop-helix interactions
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2000; 28(22): 4460 - 4466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. A. Robinson and J. M. Lopes
SURVEY AND SUMMARY: Saccharomyces cerevisiae basic helix-loop-helix proteins regulate diverse biological processes
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2000; 28(7): 1499 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. S. Anderson and J. M. Lopes
Carbon Source Regulation of PIS1 Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Involves the MCM1 Gene and the Two-component Regulatory Gene, SLN1
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 1996; 271(43): 26596 - 26601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.