Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (63K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, M
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, M
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 14 2701-2705, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The influence of base identity and base pairing on the function of the alpha-sarcin loop of 23S rRNA

M O'Connor and AE Dahlberg
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Biochemistry, J. W. Wilson Laboratory, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

The alpha-sarcin loop of large subunit rRNAs is one of the sites of interaction of elongation factors with the ribosome, and the target of the cytotoxins alpha-sarcin and ricin. Using a genetic selection for increased frameshifting in a reporter gene, we have isolated a C --> U mutation at position 2666 in the alpha-sarcin loop. In the NMR-derived structure of the loop, bases equivalent to 2666 and 2654 are paired via a non-canonical base pairing interaction. Each of the three base substitutions at C2666 and A2654 was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis of a plasmid borne copy of the rrnB operon of Escherichia coli. Only the C2666 --> U and A2654 --> G mutations that resulted in the formation of canonical A-U and C-G base pairs respectively, increased the levels of stop codon readthrough and frameshifting. The effects of different base pair combinations at positions 2666 and 2654 on ribosome function were then tested by constructing and analyzing all possible base combinations at these sites. All A --> G base substitution mutations at position 2654 and C --> U substitutions at position 2666 increased the levels of translational errors. However, these effects were greatest when G2654 and U2666 had the potential to engage in standard Watson-Crick base pairing interactions. These data indicate that base identity as well as base pairing interactions are important for the function of this essential component of the large subunit rRNA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
J. F. Atkins and G. R. Bjork
A Gripping Tale of Ribosomal Frameshifting: Extragenic Suppressors of Frameshift Mutations Spotlight P-Site Realignment
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2009; 73(1): 178 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. O'Connor, S. T. Gregory, and A. E. Dahlberg
Multiple defects in translation associated with altered ribosomal protein L4
Nucleic Acids Res., October 27, 2004; 32(19): 5750 - 5756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Leonov, P. V. Sergiev, A. A. Bogdanov, R. Brimacombe, and O. A. Dontsova
Affinity Purification of Ribosomes with a Lethal G2655C Mutation in 23 S rRNA That Affects the Translocation
J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25664 - 25670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. W. Smith, A. Meskauskas, P. Wang, P. V. Sergiev, and J. D. Dinman
Saturation Mutagenesis of 5S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 8264 - 8275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.