Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (159K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zingg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zingg, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 16 3267-3275, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Methylation inhibitors can increase the rate of cytosine deamination by (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase

JM Zingg, JC Shen, AS Yang, H Rapoport and PA Jones
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

The target cytosines of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA show increased rates of C-->T transition mutations compared to non-target cytosines. These mutations are induced either by the spontaneous deamination of 5-mC-->T generating inefficiently repaired G:T rather than G:U mismatches, or by the enzyme- induced C-->U deamination which occurs under conditions of reduced levels of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy). We tested whether various inhibitors of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases analogous to AdoMet and AdoHcy would affect the rate of enzyme-induced deamination of the target cytosine by M.HpaII and M.SssI. Interestingly, we found two compounds, sinefungin and 5'-amino- 5'-deoxyadenosine, that increased the rate of deamination 10(3)-fold in the presence and 10(4)-fold in the absence of AdoMet and AdoHcy. We have therefore identified the first mutagenic compounds specific for the target sites of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferases. A number of analogs of AdoMet and AdoHcy have been considered as possible antiviral, anticancer, antifungal and antiparasitic agents. Our findings show that chemotherapeutic agents with affinities to the cofactor binding pocket of (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase should be tested for their potential mutagenic effects.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Gallais, F. Demay, P. Barath, L. Finot, R. Jurkowska, R. Le Guevel, F. Gay, A. Jeltsch, R. Metivier, and G. Salbert
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Methyl Transferases 3a and 3b Associate with the Nuclear Orphan Receptor COUP-TFI during Gene Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2085 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. W. Laird
Cancer epigenetics
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(suppl_1): R65 - R76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S.-W. Choi and J. B. Mason
Folate Status: Effects on Pathways of Colorectal Carcinogenesis
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2413S - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. F. Chan, R. van Amerongen, T. Nijjar, E. Cuppen, P. A. Jones, and P. W. Laird
Reduced Rates of Gene Loss, Gene Silencing, and Gene Mutation in Dnmt1-Deficient Embryonic Stem Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 7587 - 7600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Rusmintratip and L. C. Sowers
An unexpectedly high excision capacity for mispaired 5-hydroxymethyluracil in human cell extracts
PNAS, December 19, 2000; 97(26): 14183 - 14187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.