Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (365K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Pater, S
Right arrow Articles by Kijne, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Pater, S
Right arrow Articles by Kijne, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 23 4624-4631, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Characterization of a zinc-dependent transcriptional activator from Arabidopsis

S de Pater, V Greco, K Pham, J Memelink and J Kijne
Center for Phytotechnology, Leiden University, The Netherlands. sbtnbp@rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl.

The C2-H2 zinc-finger is a widely occurring DNA binding motif, usually present as tandem repeats. The majority of C2-H2 zinc-finger proteins that have been studied are derived from animals. Here, we characterize a member of a distinct class of plant C2-H2 zinc-finger proteins in detail. A cDNA clone encoding a DNA binding protein from Arabidopsis was isolated by SouthWestern screening. The protein, termed ZAP1 (Zinc- dependent Activator Protein-1), is encoded by a single copy gene, which is expressed to similar levels in root and flower, to a somewhat lower level in stem and to low levels in leaf and siliques. The optimal binding site was determined by random binding site selection, and the consensus sequence found is CGTTGACCGAG. The homology between ZAP1 and other DNA binding proteins is restricted to a repeated region of a stretch of 24 highly conserved amino acids followed by a zinc-finger motif (C-X4-C-X22-23-H-X1-H). The C-terminal zinc-finger region is essential for DNA binding, whereas deletion of the N-terminal one resulted in 2.5-fold reduced binding affinity. Binding of ZAP1 to DNA was abolished by metal-chelating agents. The activation domain as determined in yeast is adjacent to and possibly overlapping with the DNA binding domain. Particle bombardment experiments with plant cells showed that ZAP1 increases expression of a gusA reporter gene that is under control of ZAP1 binding sites. We conclude that ZAP1 is a plant transcriptional activator with a C2-H2 zinc-finger DNA binding domain.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
P. Mao, M. Duan, C. Wei, and Y. Li
WRKY62 Transcription Factor Acts Downstream of Cytosolic NPR1 and Negatively Regulates Jasmonate-Responsive Gene Expression
Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 833 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M.-R. Duan, J. Nan, Y.-H. Liang, P. Mao, L. Lu, L. Li, C. Wei, L. Lai, Y. Li, and X.-D. Su
DNA binding mechanism revealed by high resolution crystal structure of Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY1 protein
Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1145 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K.-C. Kim, B. Fan, and Z. Chen
Pathogen-Induced Arabidopsis WRKY7 Is a Transcriptional Repressor and Enhances Plant Susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1180 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. O. Steffens, C. Galuschka, M. Schindler, L. Bulow, and R. Hehl
AthaMap web tools for database-assisted identification of combinatorial cis-regulatory elements and the display of highly conserved transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis thaliana
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W397 - W402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
K. Yamasaki, T. Kigawa, M. Inoue, M. Tateno, T. Yamasaki, T. Yabuki, M. Aoki, E. Seki, T. Matsuda, Y. Tomo, et al.
Solution Structure of an Arabidopsis WRKY DNA Binding Domain
PLANT CELL, March 1, 2005; 17(3): 944 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Z. Xie, Z.-L. Zhang, X. Zou, J. Huang, P. Ruas, D. Thompson, and Q. J. Shen
Annotations and Functional Analyses of the Rice WRKY Gene Superfamily Reveal Positive and Negative Regulators of Abscisic Acid Signaling in Aleurone Cells
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 176 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
F. Turck, A. Zhou, and I. E. Somssich
Stimulus-Dependent, Promoter-Specific Binding of Transcription Factor WRKY1 to Its Native Promoter and the Defense-Related Gene PcPR1-1 in Parsley
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2004; 16(10): 2573 - 2585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. L. Contento, S.-J. Kim, and D. C. Bassham
Transcriptome Profiling of the Response of Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells to Suc Starvation
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 2330 - 2347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. O. Steffens, C. Galuschka, M. Schindler, L. Bulow, and R. Hehl
AthaMap: an online resource for in silico transcription factor binding sites in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D368 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. S. Johnson, B. Kolevski, and D. R. Smyth
TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a Trichome and Seed Coat Development Gene of Arabidopsis, Encodes a WRKY Transcription Factor
PLANT CELL, June 1, 2002; 14(6): 1359 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Robatzek and I. E. Somssich
Targets of AtWRKY6 regulation during plant senescence and pathogen defense
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2002; 16(9): 1139 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.