Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (84K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ke, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wartell, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ke, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wartell, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 4 707-712, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The thermal stability of DNA fragments with tandem mismatches at a d(CXYG).d(CY'X'G) site

SH Ke and RM Wartell
School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Temperature-Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (TGGE) was employed to determine the thermal stabilities of 28 DNA fragments, 373 bp long, with two adjacent mismatched base pairs, and eight DNAs with Watson- Crick base pairs at the same positions. Heteroduplex DNAs containing two adjacent mismatches were formed by melting and reannealing pairs of homologous 373 bp DNA fragments differing by two adjacent base pairs. Product DNAs were separated based on their thermal stability by parallel and perpendicular TGGE. The polyacrylamide gel contained 3.36 M urea and 19.2 % formamide to lower the DNA melting temperatures. The order of stability was determined in the sequence context d(CXYG).d(CY'X'G) where X.X' and Y.Y" represent the mismatched or Watson-Crick base pairs. The identity of the mismatched bases and their stacking interactions influence DNA stability. Mobility transition melting temperatures (T u) of the DNAs with adjacent mismatches were 1.0-3.6 degrees C (+/-0.2 degree C) lower than the homoduplex DNA with the d(CCAG).d(CTGG) sequence. Two adjacent G.A pairs, d(CGAG).d(CGAG), created a more stable DNA than DNAs with Watson-Crick A.T pairs at the same sites. The d(GA).d(GA) sequence is estimated to be 0.4 (+/-30%) kcal/mol more stable in free energy than d(AA).d(TT) base pairs. This result confirms the unusual stability of the d(GA).d(GA) sequence previously observed in DNA oligomers. All other DNAs with adjacent mismatched base pairs were less stable than Watson-Crick homoduplex DNAs. Their relative stabilities followed an order expected from previous results on single mismatches. Two homoduplex DNAs with identical nearest neighbor sequences but different next-nearest neighbor sequences had a small but reproducible difference in T u value. This result indicates that sequence dependent next neighbor stacking interactions influence DNA stability.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Sen and P. E. Nielsen
On the stability of peptide nucleic acid duplexes in the presence of organic solvents
Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2007; 35(10): 3367 - 3374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S.-H. Chou, K.-H. Chin, and A. H.-J. Wang
Unusual DNA duplex and hairpin motifs
Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2003; 31(10): 2461 - 2474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Asagoshi, H. Terato, Y. Ohyama, and H. Ide
Effects of a Guanine-derived Formamidopyrimidine Lesion on DNA Replication. TRANSLESION DNA SYNTHESIS, NUCLEOTIDE INSERTION, AND EXTENSION KINETICS
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14589 - 14597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.