Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (77K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hess, M.
Right arrow Articles by Naegeli, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hess, M.
Right arrow Articles by Naegeli, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 5 824-828, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

A repair competition assay to assess recognition by human nucleotide excision repair

MT Hess, D Gunz and H Naegeli
Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich- Tierspital, Zurich, Switzerland.

We developed a competition assay to compare, in a quantitative manner, the ability of human nucleotide excision repair (NER) to recognise structurally different forms of DNA damage. This assay uses a NER substrate consisting of M13 double-stranded DNA with a single and uniquely located acetylaminofluorene (AAF) adduct, and measures the efficiency by which multiply damaged plasmid DNA competes for excision repair of the site-directed modification. To validate this assay, we tested competitor DNA containing defined numbers of either AAF adducts or UV radiation products. In both cases, repair of the site-directed NER substrate was inhibited in a damage-specific and dose-dependent manner. We then exploited this competition assay to determine the susceptibility of bulky adozelesin-DNA adducts to human NER.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-H. Choi, L. A. Lindsey-Boltz, and A. Sancar
Reconstitution of a human ATR-mediated checkpoint response to damaged DNA
PNAS, August 14, 2007; 104(33): 13301 - 13306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Buterin, M. T. Hess, D. Gunz, N. E. Geacintov, L. H. Mullenders, and H. Naegeli
Trapping of DNA Nucleotide Excision Repair Factors by Nonrepairable Carcinogen Adducts
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4229 - 4235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Hess, H. Naegeli, and M. Capobianco
Stereoselectivity of Human Nucleotide Excision Repair Promoted by Defective Hybridization
J. Biol. Chem., October 23, 1998; 273(43): 27867 - 27872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Gunz, M. T. Hess, and H. Naegeli
Recognition of DNA Adducts by Human Nucleotide Excision Repair. EVIDENCE FOR A THERMODYNAMIC PROBING MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 1996; 271(41): 25089 - 25098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.