Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (140K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, B
Right arrow Articles by Tuite, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, B
Right arrow Articles by Tuite, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 24, Issue 6 1080-1090, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Single- and double-strand photocleavage of DNA by YO, YOYO and TOTO

B Akerman and E Tuite
Department of Physical Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.

Photocleavage of dsDNA by the fluorescent DNA stains oxazole yellow (YO), its dimer YOYO) and the dimer TOTO of thiazole orange (TO) has been investigated as a function of binding ratio. On visible illumination, both YO and YOYO cause single-strand cleavage, with an efficiency that varies with the dye/DNA binding ratio in a manner which can be rationalized in terms of free dye being an inefficient photocleavage reagent and externally bound dye being more efficient than intercalated dye. Moreover, the photocleavage mechanism changes with binding mode. Photocleavage by externally bound dye is, at least partly, oxygen dependent with scavenger studies implicating singlet oxygen as the activated oxygen intermediate. Photocleavage by intercalated dye is essentially oxygen-independent but can be inhibited by moderate concentrations of beta- mercaptoethanol--direct attack on the phosphoribose backbone is a possible mechanism. TOTO causes single- strand cleavage approximately five times less efficiently than YOYO. No direct double-strand breaks (dsb) are detected with YO or YOYO, but in both cases single-strand breaks (ssb) are observed to accumulate to eventually produce double-strand cleavage. With intercalated YO the accumulation occurs in a manner consistent with random generation of strand lesions, while with bisintercalated YOYO the yield of double- strand cleavage (per ssb) is 5-fold higher. A contributing factor is the slow dissociation of the bis-intercalated dimer, which allows for repeated strand-attack at the same binding site, but the observation that the dsb/ssb yield is considerably lower for externally bound than for bis-intercalated YOYO at low dye/DNA ratios indicates that the binding geometry and/or the cleavage mechanism are also important for the high dsb-efficiency. In fact, double-strand cleavage yields with bis-intercalated YOYO are higher than those predicted by simple models, implying a greater than statistical probability for a second cleavage event to occur adjacent to the first (i.e. to be induced by the same YOYO molecule). With TOTO the efficiency of the ssb-accumulation is comparable to that observed with YOYO.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. A. Tanner, J. J. Loparo, S. M. Hamdan, S. Jergic, N. E. Dixon, and A. M. van Oijen
Real-time single-molecule observation of rolling-circle DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2009; 37(4): e27 - e27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. van Mameren, E. J. G. Peterman, and G. J. L. Wuite
See me, feel me: methods to concurrently visualize and manipulate single DNA molecules and associated proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2008; 36(13): 4381 - 4389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Korlach, P. J. Marks, R. L. Cicero, J. J. Gray, D. L. Murphy, D. B. Roitman, T. T. Pham, G. A. Otto, M. Foquet, and S. W. Turner
Selective aluminum passivation for targeted immobilization of single DNA polymerase molecules in zero-mode waveguide nanostructures
PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1176 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Riehn, M. Lu, Y.-M. Wang, S. F. Lim, E. C. Cox, and R. H. Austin
Restriction mapping in nanofluidic devices
PNAS, July 19, 2005; 102(29): 10012 - 10016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Zipper, H. Brunner, J. Bernhagen, and F. Vitzthum
Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications
Nucleic Acids Res., July 12, 2004; 32(12): e103 - e103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. Y. Chan, N. M. Goncalves, R. A. Haeusler, A. J. Hatch, J. W. Larson, A. M. Maletta, G. R. Yantz, E. D. Carstea, M. Fuchs, G. G. Wong, et al.
DNA Mapping Using Microfluidic Stretching and Single-Molecule Detection of Fluorescent Site-Specific Tags
Genome Res., June 1, 2004; 14(6): 1137 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Gueroui, C. Place, E. Freyssingeas, and B. Berge
Observation by fluorescence microscopy of transcription on single combed DNA
PNAS, April 30, 2002; 99(9): 6005 - 6010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S.-i. Matsuura, J. Komatsu, K. Hirano, H. Yasuda, K. Takashima, S. Katsura, and A. Mizuno
Real-time observation of a single DNA digestion by {lambda} exonuclease under a fluorescence microscope field
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2001; 29(16): e79 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.