Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 25, Issue 11 2114-2120, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
A Karyagina, I Shilov, V Tashlitskii, M Khodoun, S Vasil'ev, PCK Lau and I Nikolskaya
The regulation of the Sso II restriction-modification system from Shigella
sonnei was studied in vivo and in vitro . In lacZ fusion experiments, Sso
II methyltransferase (M. Sso II) was found to repress its own synthesis but
stimulate expression of the cognate restriction endonuclease (ENase). The
N-terminal 72 amino acids of M. Sso II, predicted to form a
helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif, was found to be responsible for the specific
DNA-binding and regulatory function of M. Sso II. Similar HTH motifs are
predicted in the N-terminus of a number of 5-methylcytosine
methyltransferases, particularly M. Eco RII, M.dcm and M. Msp I, of which
the ability to regulate autogenously has been proposed. In vitro, the
binding of M. Sso II to its target DNA was investigated using a mobility
shift assay. M. Sso II forms a specific and stable complex with a 140 bp
DNA fragment containing the promoter region of Sso II R-M system. The
dissociation constant (Kd) was determined to be 1.5x10(-8) M. DNaseI
footprinting experiments demonstrated that M. Sso II protects a 48-52 bp
region immediately upstream of the M. Sso II coding sequence which includes
the predicted - 10 promoter sequence of M. Sso II and the -10 and -35
sequences of R. Sso II.
ARTICLES
Specific binding of sso II DNA methyltransferase to its promoter region provides the regulation of sso II restriction-modification gene expression
Institute of BioMedical Chemistry, 10 Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119832, Russia. ann@agrobio.msk.su
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Protsenko, M. Zakharova, M. Nagornykh, A. Solonin, and K. Severinov Transcription regulation of restriction-modification system Ecl18kI Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2009; 37(16): 5322 - 5330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Handa, A. Ichige, and I. Kobayashi Contribution of RecFOR machinery of homologous recombination to cell survival after loss of a restriction-modification gene complex Microbiology, July 1, 2009; 155(7): 2320 - 2332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Asakura and I. Kobayashi From damaged genome to cell surface: transcriptome changes during bacterial cell death triggered by loss of a restriction-modification gene complex Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2009; 37(9): 3021 - 3031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohno, N. Handa, M. Watanabe-Matsui, N. Takahashi, and I. Kobayashi Maintenance Forced by a Restriction-Modification System Can Be Modulated by a Region in Its Modification Enzyme Not Essential for Methyltransferase Activity J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2008; 190(6): 2039 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu and I. Kobayashi Negative Regulation of the EcoRI Restriction Enzyme Gene Is Associated with Intragenic Reverse Promoters J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2007; 189(19): 6928 - 6935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Casadesus and D. Low Epigenetic Gene Regulation in the Bacterial World Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 830 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Semenova, L. Minakhin, E. Bogdanova, M. Nagornykh, A. Vasilov, T. Heyduk, A. Solonin, M. Zakharova, and K. Severinov Transcription regulation of the EcoRV restriction-modification system Nucleic Acids Res., December 6, 2005; 33(21): 6942 - 6951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ichige and I. Kobayashi Stability of EcoRI Restriction-Modification Enzymes In Vivo Differentiates the EcoRI Restriction-Modification System from Other Postsegregational Cell Killing Systems J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2005; 187(19): 6612 - 6621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Christensen and J. Josephsen The Methyltransferase from the LlaDII Restriction-Modification System Influences the Level of Expression of Its Own Gene J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2004; 186(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kobayashi Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2001; 29(18): 3742 - 3756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Butler and G. F. Fitzgerald Transcriptional Analysis and Regulation of Expression of the ScrFI Restriction-Modification System of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC503 J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2001; 183(15): 4668 - 4673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chinen, Y. Naito, N. Handa, and I. Kobayashi Evolution of Sequence Recognition by Restriction-Modification Enzymes: Selective Pressure for Specificity Decrease Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2000; 17(11): 1610 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. V. Beletskaya, M. V. Zakharova, M. G. Shlyapnikov, L. M. Semenova, and A. S. Solonin DNA methylation at the CfrBI site is involved in expression control in the CfrBI restriction-modification system Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2000; 28(19): 3817 - 3822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nakayama and I. Kobayashi Restriction-modification gene complexes as selfish gene entities: Roles of a regulatory system in their establishment, maintenance, and apoptotic mutual exclusion PNAS, May 26, 1998; 95(11): 6442 - 6447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





