Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (138K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucibello, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucibello, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 25, Issue 24 4921-4925, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The differential binding of E2F and CDF repressor complexes contributes to the timing of cell cycle-regulated transcription

FC Lucibello, N Liu, J Zwicker, C Gross and R Muller
Institut fur Molekularbiologie und Tumorforschung (IMT), Philipps- Universitat Marburg, Emil-Mannkopff-Strasse 2, D-35033 Marburg, Germany.

B- myb and cdc25C exemplify different groups of genes whose transcription is consecutively up-regulated during the cell cycle. Both promoters are controlled by transcriptional repression via modules consisting of an E2F binding site (E2FBS) or the related CDE plus a contiguous CHR co-repressor element. We now show that the B- myb repressor module, which is derepressed early (mid G1), is preferentially recognized by E2F-DP complexes and that a mutation selectively abolishing E2F binding impairs regulation. In contrast, the cdc25C repressor module, which is derepressed late (S/G2), interacts selectively with CDE-CHR binding factor-1 (CDF-1). E2F binding, but not CDF-1 binding, requires specific nucleotides flanking the E2FBS/CDE core, while CDF-1 binding, but not E2F binding, depends on specific nucleotides in the CHR. Swapping these nucleotides between the two promoters profoundly changes protein binding patterns and alters expression kinetics. Thus predominant CDF-1 binding leads to derepression in late S, predominant E2F binding results in up- regulation in late G1, while promoters binding both E2F and CDF-1 with high efficiency show intermediate kinetics. Our results support a model where the differential binding of E2F and CDF-1 repressor complexes contributes to the timing of promoter activity during the cell cycle.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Catchpole, F. Tavner, L. Le Cam, C. Sardet, and R. J. Watson
A B-myb Promoter Corepressor Site Facilitates in Vivo Occupation of the Adjacent E2F Site by p107{middle dot}E2F and p130{middle dot}E2F Complexes
J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 2002; 277(41): 39015 - 39024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
R. J. Rooney
Cell Cycle Attenuation by p120E4F Is Accompanied by Increased Mitotic Dysfunction
Cell Growth Differ., October 1, 2001; 12(10): 505 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M.-E. Chabouté, B. Clément, M. Sekine, G. Philipps, and N. Chaubet-Gigot
Cell Cycle Regulation of the Tobacco Ribonucleotide Reductase Small Subunit Gene Is Mediated by E2F-like Elements
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2000; 12(10): 1987 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Fry and P. J. Farnham
Context-dependent Transcriptional Regulation
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 1999; 274(42): 29583 - 29586.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.