Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Acharya, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Acharya, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 25, Issue 4 7-14, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Role of proofreading and mismatch repair in maintaining the stability of nucleotide repeats in DNA

BS Strauss, D Sagher and S Acharya
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago , IL 60637, USA

The role of the proofreading exonuclease in maintaining the stability of multiply repeated units in DNA was studied inEscherichia coli. Reversion of plasmids in which thebeta-galactosidasealphacomplementing sequence was moved +2 out of frame by inserts containing (CA)14, (CA)5, (CA)2or (TA)6or +1 by creating a run of 8 C was compared inmutSandmutSdnaQstrains. Proofreading corrects at least half of the frameshift errors for all the plasmids and at least 99% of the errors in the (CA)2plasmid. The (CA)2plasmid reverts mostly by +1 frameshifts in the restriction sites flanking the insert. With the (CA)14, (TA)6, (CA)5and 8C plasmids, reversion is mainly by loss of a repeat unit. The data support the hypothesis that thednaQgene product recognizes frameshifts close to the DNA growing point. Frameshifts distal to the growing point are mainly corrected by mismatch repair.We speculate that mismatches in mononucleotide repeats are susceptible to proofreading because they can either migrate to a point where they are recognized by the exonuclease or, alternatively, because single nucleotide distortions are more readily detected than dinucleotides.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
V. Curwen, E. Eyras, T. D. Andrews, L. Clarke, E. Mongin, S. M.J. Searle, and M. Clamp
The Ensembl Automatic Gene Annotation System
Genome Res., May 1, 2004; 14(5): 942 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Sperisen, C. Iseli, M. Pagni, B. J. Stevenson, P. Bucher, and C. V. Jongeneel
trome, trEST and trGEN: databases of predicted protein sequences
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D509 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
P. Rapp and L. H. E. Gabriel-Jurgens
Degradation of alkanes and highly chlorinated benzenes, and production of biosurfactants, by a psychrophilic Rhodococcus sp. and genetic characterization of its chlorobenzene dioxygenase
Microbiology, October 1, 2003; 149(10): 2879 - 2890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.