Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 25, Issue 5 1082-1084, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press
JM Andrews, GC Newbound and MD Lairmore
In this study, we report that commonly used methods of transient
transfection induce the cellular stress response and a recovery period is
required following transfection when analyzing cellular stress responsive
genes. Four transfection methods were examined for their ability to induce
the stress response by measuring the expression of heat shock protein (hsp)
72. We demonstrate that electroporation increases expression of hsp 72 in
HUT 78 cells. Additionally, DEAE- dextran and liposome-mediated
transfection resulted in increased hsp 72 expression in an adherent cell
line (HeLa). Liposome-mediated transfection differentially induced cell
stress, dependent on the transfection time in serum-free culture
conditions. The stress responsiveness of two viral promoters, the HTLV-1
long terminal repeat and CMV immediate early transcriptional unit were
examined. We found the maximal stress-mediated enhancement of transcription
with both promoters did not occur until the cells recovered for 24 h
following transfection.
ARTICLES
Transcriptional modulation of viral reporter gene constructs following induction of the cellular stress response
Center for Retrovirus Research and Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Arthur James Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. jan_andrews@ncsu.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L. Parks, R. A. Lerch, P. Walpita, M. S. Sidhu, and S. A. Udem Enhanced Measles Virus cDNA Rescue and Gene Expression after Heat Shock J. Virol., May 1, 1999; 73(5): 3560 - 3566. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
