Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (236K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kiyama, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kiyama, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 25, Issue 9 1701-1708, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Enrichment of oligo(dG).oligo(dC)-containing fragments from human genomic DNA by Mg 2+-dependent triplex affinity capture

N Nishikawa, N Kanda, M Oishi and R Kiyama
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan.

Oligo(dG).oligo(dC)- or short poly(dG).poly(dC)-containing fragments were enriched and cloned by means of Mg2+-dependent triplex affinity capture and subsequent cloning procedures. A library constructed after three cycles of enrichment showed that approximately 80% of the clones in the supercoiled form formed a complex with labeled oligonucleotide (dG)34. However, while the rest of the clones retained the ability to form a complex (type I clones), 90.9% failed to form a complex when they were linearized. This group of DNA was abundant in the genomic DNA, although it showed only approximately 3-fold enrichment by one cycle of affinity capture. This group was further classified into two species (types II and III) based on complex formation ability after phenol extraction. Type II clones retained the complex formation ability after treatment, while the human telomere [(TTAGGG)n] and telomere-like [(TGGAA)n] or [(TGGAG)n] sequences belonging to type III clones did not. Serial deletion experiments and the binding assays using oligonucleotides confirmed that the repetitive units containing T(G)nT ( n = 3-5) tracts or (G)n-motifs (n >/= 3) were the sites of complex formation for type II and III clones. On the other hand, type I clones contained poly(dG).poly(dC) tracts at least 10 nt long, and DNase I-footprinting analysis indicated that these tracts were the sites of complex formation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.