Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (143K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bharati, S.
Right arrow Articles by Slupphaug, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bharati, S.
Right arrow Articles by Slupphaug, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 26, Issue 21 4953-4959, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Human mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase preform (UNG1) is processed to two forms one of which is resistant to inhibition by AP sites

S Bharati, HE Krokan, L Kristiansen, M Otterlei and G Slupphaug
Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway.

The preform of human mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG1) contains 35 N-terminal residues required for mitochondrial targeting. We have examined processing of human UNG1 expressed in insect cells and processing in vitro by human mitochondrial extracts . In insect cells we detected a major processed form lacking 29 of the 35 unique N- terminal residues (UNG1Delta29, 31 kDa) and two minor forms lacking the 75 and 77 N-terminal residues, respectively (UNG1Delta75 and UNG1Delta77, 26 kDa). Purified UNG1Delta29 was effectively cleaved in vitro to a fully active 26 kDa form by human mitochondrial extracts. Furthermore, endogenous forms of 31 and 26 kDa were also observed in HeLa mitochondrial extracts. The sequences at the cleavage sites, as identified by peptide sequencing, were compatible with the known specificity of mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP). However, in vitro cleavage of UNG1Delta29 by mitochondrial extracts did not require divalent cations and was stimulated by EDTA, indicating the involvement of a processing peptidase distinct from MPP at the second site. Interestingly, while UNG1Delta29 generally has the typical properties reported for other uracil-DNA glycosylases, it is not inhibited by apurinic/apyrimidinic sites. Our results indicate that the preform of human mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase is processed to distinctly different forms lacking 29 or 75/77 N-terminal residues, respectively.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
B. Kavli, S. Andersen, M. Otterlei, N. B. Liabakk, K. Imai, A. Fischer, A. Durandy, H. E. Krokan, and G. Slupphaug
B cells from hyper-IgM patients carrying UNG mutations lack ability to remove uracil from ssDNA and have elevated genomic uracil
J. Exp. Med., June 20, 2005; 201(12): 2011 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Akbari, M. Otterlei, J. Pena-Diaz, P. A. Aas, B. Kavli, N. B. Liabakk, L. Hagen, K. Imai, A. Durandy, G. Slupphaug, et al.
Repair of U/G and U/A in DNA by UNG2-associated repair complexes takes place predominantly by short-patch repair both in proliferating and growth-arrested cells
Nucleic Acids Res., October 12, 2004; 32(18): 5486 - 5498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Acharya, R. K. Talawar, K. Saikrishnan, M. Vijayan, and U. Varshney
Substitutions at tyrosine 66 of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase lead to characterization of an efficient enzyme that is recalcitrant to product inhibition
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7216 - 7226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Gu and A-L. Lu
Differential DNA recognition and glycosylase activity of the native human MutY homolog (hMYH) and recombinant hMYH expressed in bacteria
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2001; 29(12): 2666 - 2674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A.-K. Olsen, H. Bjortuft, R. Wiger, J. Holme, E. Seeberg, M. Bjoras, and G. Brunborg
Highly efficient base excision repair (BER) in human and rat male germ cells
Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2001; 29(8): 1781 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. E. Farez-Vidal, C. Gallego, L. M. Ruiz-Perez, and D. Gonzalez-Pacanowska
Characterization of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity from Trypanosoma cruzi and its stimulation by AP endonuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2001; 29(7): 1549 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
E. Cappelli, T. Hazra, J. W. Hill, G. Slupphaug, M. Bogliolo, and G. Frosina
Rates of base excision repair are not solely dependent on levels of initiating enzymes
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2001; 22(3): 387 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. W. Hill, T. K. Hazra, T. Izumi, and S. Mitra
Stimulation of human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by AP-endonuclease: potential coordination of the initial steps in base excision repair
Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2001; 29(2): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Sandigursky and W. A. Franklin
Uracil-DNA Glycosylase in the Extreme Thermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2000; 275(25): 19146 - 19149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Parker, Y. Gu, W. Mahoney, S.-H. Lee, K. K. Singh, and A-L. Lu
Human Homolog of the MutY Repair Protein (hMYH) Physically Interacts with Proteins Involved in Long Patch DNA Base Excision Repair
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5547 - 5555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.