Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (155K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 26, Issue 6 1440-1448, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

A simulation of subtractive hybridization

TJ Cho and SS Park
Department of Biochemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, Korea. tjcho@cbucc.chungbuk.ac.kr

Various strategies employed in genomic DNA cloning by subtractive hybridization have been examined by computer simulations, with the comparison between the predictions and the published results. The result shows that the efficiency of target sequence enrichment and the sensitivity to experimental conditions depend strongly on the enrichment strategy employed. The strategy selecting only tester/tester after hybridization can be very efficient to enrich targets. For successful target enrichment, however, the strategy requires a highly efficient subtraction method and proper hybridization conditions. The strategy also requires that the selected DNA be amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after each or each alternate subtraction. By contrast, the strategy selecting tester/tester plus single-stranded tester is less sensitive to various experimental factors, compared with the strategy selecting only tester/tester. However, it is not as efficient. With this strategy, the tester DNA selected may or may not be amplified by PCR before the next round. In the case of the strategy selecting single-stranded tester, the target DNA can be successfully enriched only when the selected DNA is directly used without PCR amplification in the next round. The strong features of existing methods can be combined to develop a protocol that is more efficient and more reliable.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.