Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (270K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Sloun, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vrieling, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Sloun, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vrieling, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 27, Issue 16 3276-3282, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The role of nucleotide excision repair in protecting embryonic stem cells from genotoxic effects of UV-induced DNA damage

PP Van Sloun, JG Jansen, G Weeda, LH Mullenders, AA van Zeeland, PH Lohman and H Vrieling
Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis-MGC, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9503, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

In this study the role of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in protecting mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells against the genotoxic effects of UV-photolesions was analysed. Repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) in transcribed genes could not be detected whereas the removal of (6-4) photoproducts (6-4PP) was incomplete, already reaching its maximum (30%) 4 h after irradiation. Measurements of repair replication revealed a saturation of NER activity at UV doses >5 J/m2 while at a lower dose (2.5 J/m2) the repair kinetics were similar to those in murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of photolesions were determined in ES cells differing in NER activity. ERCC1-deficient ES cells were hypermutable (10-fold) compared to wild-type cells, indicating that at physiologically relevant doses ES cells efficiently remove photolesions. The effect of the NER deficiency on cytoxicity was only 2-fold. Exposure to high UV doses (10 J/m2) resulted in a rapid and massive induction of apoptosis. Possibly, to avoid the accumulation of mutated cells, ES cells rely on the induction of a strong apoptotic response with a simultaneous shutting down of NER activity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. G. Jansen, A. Tsaalbi-Shtylik, P. Langerak, F. Calléja, C. M. Meijers, H. Jacobs, and N. de Wind
The BRCT domain of mammalian Rev1 is involved in regulating DNA translesion synthesis
Nucleic Acids Res., January 13, 2005; 33(1): 356 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Hong and P. J. Stambrook
Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation
PNAS, October 5, 2004; 101(40): 14443 - 14448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. B. Cervantes, J. R. Stringer, C. Shao, J. A. Tischfield, and P. J. Stambrook
Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type
PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3586 - 3590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Jansen, A. K. Olsen, R. Wiger, H. Naegeli, P. de Boer, F. van der Hoeven, J. A. Holme, G. Brunborg, and L. Mullenders
Nucleotide excision repair in rat male germ cells: low level of repair in intact cells contrasts with high dual incision activity in vitro
Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2001; 29(8): 1791 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.