Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (356K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raghavan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ouzounis, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raghavan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ouzounis, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 27, Issue 22 4405-4408, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Novel coding regions in four complete archaeal genomes

S Raghavan and CA Ouzounis
Computational Genomics Group, Research Programme, The European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL Cambridge Outstation, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.

In the process of analysing the four available complete archaeal genomes, we have noted that certain regions characterised as 'non- coding' exhibit significant sequence similarity to other protein sequences from Archaea and other species. Using established technology, we have identified a number of potential protein coding regions in these putative 'non-coding' regions. We have detected 524 such cases, of which 113 regions appear to code for proteins present in archaeal or other species, while the remaining 411 regions are mostly start/stop definition conflicts. Of the 113 protein coding regions, only 21 code for proteins with homologues of known function. The number of novel coding sequences identified herein amounts to 1. 5% of the total genome entries, while the conflicting cases represent an additional 5%. The observed differences between the four complete archaeal genomes seem to reflect disparate approaches to genome annotation. Genome sequence collections should be regularly checked to improve gene prediction by sequence similarity and greater effort is required to make gene definitions consistent across related species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. C. Kyrpides, C. A. Ouzounis, I. Iliopoulos, V. Vonstein, and R. Overbeek
Analysis of the Thermotoga maritima genome combining a variety of sequence similarity and genome context tools
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2000; 28(22): 4573 - 4576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.