Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (207K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 18 3564-3569
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Requirement for Phe36 for DNA binding and mismatch repair by Escherichia coli MutS protein

Akira Yamamoto, Mark J. Schofield, Indranil Biswas and Peggy Hsieh*

Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1810, USA

The MutS family of DNA repair proteins recognizes base pair mismatches and insertion/deletion mismatches and targets them for repair in a strand-specific manner. Photocrosslinking and mutational studies previously identified a highly conserved Phe residue at the N-terminus of Thermus aquaticus MutS protein that is critical for mismatch recognition in vitro. Here, a mutant Escherichia coli MutS protein harboring a substitution of Ala for the corresponding Phe36 residue is assessed for proficiency in mismatch repair in vivo and DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis in vitro. The F36A protein is unable to restore mismatch repair proficiency to a mutS strain as judged by mutation to rifampicin or reversion of a specific point mutation in lacZ. The F36A protein is also severely deficient for binding to heteroduplexes containing an unpaired thymidine or a G:T mismatch although its intrinsic ATPase activity and subunit oligomerization are very similar to that of the wild-type MutS protein. Thus, the F36A mutation appears to confer a defect specific for recognition of insertion/deletion and base pair mismatches.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 301 496 0306; Fax: +1 301 496 9878; Email: hsieh@ncifcrf.gov Present addresses: Akira Yamamoto, 2nd Department of Physiology, Kagawa Medical School, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan Indranil Biswas, National Center for Cell Science, Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. Pogorzala, S. Mookerjee, and E. A. Sia
Evidence That Msh1p Plays Multiple Roles in Mitochondrial Base Excision Repair
Genetics, July 1, 2009; 182(3): 699 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Tessmer, Y. Yang, J. Zhai, C. Du, P. Hsieh, M. M. Hingorani, and D. A. Erie
Mechanism of MutS Searching for DNA Mismatches and Signaling Repair
J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2008; 283(52): 36646 - 36654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. R. Salsbury Jr, J. E. Clodfelter, M. B. Gentry, T. Hollis, and K. D. Scarpinato
The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response.
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(8): 2173 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Natrajan, M. H. Lamers, J. H. Enzlin, H. H. K. Winterwerp, A. Perrakis, and T. K. Sixma
Structures of Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS in complex with different mismatches: a common recognition mode for diverse substrates
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): 4814 - 4821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Hess, R. D. Gupta, and R. D. Kolodner
Dominant Saccharomyces cerevisiae msh6 Mutations Cause Increased Mispair Binding and Decreased Dissociation from Mispairs by Msh2-Msh6 in the Presence of ATP
J. Biol. Chem., July 5, 2002; 277(28): 25545 - 25553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. R. Wigneshweraraj, P. Casaz, and M. Buck
Correlating protein footprinting with mutational analysis in the bacterial transcription factor {sigma}54 ({sigma}N)
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2002; 30(4): 1016 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Schofield, F. E. Brownewell, S. Nayak, C. Du, E. T. Kool, and P. Hsieh
The Phe-X-Glu DNA Binding Motif of MutS. THE ROLE OF HYDROGEN BONDING IN MISMATCH RECOGNITION
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 45505 - 45508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Drotschmann, W. Yang, F. E. Brownewell, E. T. Kool, and T. A. Kunkel
Asymmetric Recognition of DNA Local Distortion. STRUCTURE-BASED FUNCTIONAL STUDIES OF EUKARYOTIC Msh2-Msh6
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46225 - 46229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.