Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (401K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardwidge, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardwidge, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 12 2619-2625
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Experimental evaluation of the Liu–Beveridge dinucleotide step model of DNA structure

Philip R. Hardwidge and L. James Maher*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Methods for predicting DNA curvature have many possible applications. Dinucleotide step models describe DNA shape by characterization of helical twist, deflection angles and the direction of deflection for nearest neighbor base pairs. Liu and Beveridge have extended previous applications of dinucleotide step models with the development and qualitative validation of a predictive method for sequence-dependent DNA curvature (the LB model). We tested whether the LB model accurately predicts experimentally deduced curvature angles and helical repeat parameters for DNA sequences not in its training set, particularly when challenged with quantitative data and subtle sequence phasings. We examined a series of 17 well-characterized DNA sequences to compare electrophoretic and computational results. The LB model is superior to two other models in the prediction of helical repeat parameters. We observed a strong linear correlation between curvature magnitudes predicted using the LB model and those determined by electrophoretic ligation ladder experiments, although the LB model somewhat underestimated apparent curvature. With longer electrophoretic phasing probes the LB model slightly overestimated gel mobility anomalies, with modest deviations in predicted helical repeat parameters. Overall, our analyses suggest that the LB model provides reasonably accurate predictions for the electrophoretic behavior of DNA.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 507 284 9041; Fax: +1 507 284 2053; Email: maher{at}mayo.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. M. Zimmerman and L. J. Maher III
Solution measurement of DNA curvature in papillomavirus E2 binding sites
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5134 - 5139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.