Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (388K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jeltsch, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jeltsch, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 15 3137-3144
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Changing the target base specificity of the EcoRV DNA methyltransferase by rational de novo protein-design

Markus Roth and Albert Jeltsch*

Institut für Biochemie, Fachbereich 8, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany

The EcoRV DNA-(adenine-N6)-methyltransferase (M.EcoRV) specifically modifies the first adenine residue within GATATC sequences. During catalysis, the enzyme flips its target base out of the DNA helix and binds it into a target base binding pocket which is formed in part by Lys16 and Tyr196. A cytosine residue is accepted by wild-type M.EcoRV as a substrate at a 31-fold reduced efficiency with respect to the kcat/KM values if it is located in a CT mismatch substrate (GCTATC/GATATC). Cytosine residues positioned in a CG base pair (GCTATC/GATAGC) are modified at much more reduced rates, because flipping out the target base is much more difficult in this case. We intended to change the target base specificity of M.EcoRV from adenine-N6 to cytosine-N4. To this end we generated, purified and characterized 15 variants of the enzyme, containing single, double and triple amino acid exchanges following different design approaches. One concept was to reduce the size of the target base binding pocket by site-directed mutagenesis. The K16R variant showed an altered specificity, with a 22-fold preference for cytosine as the target base in a mismatch substrate. This corresponds to a 680-fold change in specificity, which was accompanied by only a small loss in catalytic activity with the cytosine substrate. The K16R/Y196W variant no longer methylated adenine residues at all and its activity towards cytosine was reduced only 17-fold. Therefore, we have changed the target base specificity of M.EcoRV from adenine to cytosine by rational protein design. Because there are no natural paragons for the variants described here, a change of the target base specificity of a DNA interacting enzyme was possible by rational de novo design of its active site.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 641 99 35411; Fax: +49 641 99 35409; Email: albert.jeltsch{at}chemie.bio.uni-giessen.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
E. Timar, P. Venetianer, and A. Kiss
In Vivo DNA Protection by Relaxed-Specificity SinI DNA Methyltransferase Variants
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2008; 190(24): 8003 - 8008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Liebert, J. R. Horton, S. Chahar, M. Orwick, X. Cheng, and A. Jeltsch
Two Alternative Conformations of S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine Bound to Escherichia coli DNA Adenine Methyltransferase and the Implication of Conformational Changes in Regulating the Catalytic Cycle
J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22848 - 22855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Timar, G. Groma, A. Kiss, and P. Venetianer
Changing the recognition specificity of a DNA-methyltransferase by in vitro evolution
Nucleic Acids Res., July 25, 2004; 32(13): 3898 - 3903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
H. M. Cohen, D. S. Tawfik, and A. D. Griffiths
Altering the sequence specificity of HaeIII methyltransferase by directed evolution using in vitro compartmentalization
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 3 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Evdokimov, V. V. Zinoviev, E. G. Malygin, S. L. Schlagman, and S. Hattman
Bacteriophage T4 Dam DNA-[N6-adenine]Methyltransferase. KINETIC EVIDENCE FOR A CATALYTICALLY ESSENTIAL CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE IN THE TERNARY COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.