Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (507K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daughdrill, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daughdrill, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, D. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 15 3270-3276
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The weak interdomain coupling observed in the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A is unaffected by ssDNA binding

Gary W. Daughdrill*, Jennifer Ackerman1, Nancy G. Isern2, Maria V. Botuyan3, Cheryl Arrowsmith3, Marc S. Wold4 and David F. Lowry2

Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Idaho, PO Box 443052, Life Science South Room 142, Moscow, ID 83844-3052, USA, 1PO Box 16204, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309, USA, 2Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, WA 99352, USA, 3Division of Molecular and Structural Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada and 4Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, 51 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52240-1109, USA

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric, multi-functional protein that binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and is essential for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Using heteronuclear NMR methods we have investigated the domain interactions and ssDNA binding of a fragment from the 70 kDa subunit of human RPA (hRPA70). This fragment contains an N-terminal domain (NTD), which is important for hRPA70–protein interactions, connected to a ssDNA-binding domain (SSB1) by a flexible linker (hRPA701–326). Correlation analysis of the amide 1H and 15N chemical shifts was used to compare the structure of the NTD and SSB1 in hRPA701–326 with two smaller fragments that corresponded to the individual domains. High correlation coefficients verified that the NTD and SSB1 maintained their structures in hRPA701–326, indicating weak interdomain coupling. Weak interdomain coupling was also suggested by a comparison of the transverse relaxation rates for hRPA701–326 and one of the smaller hRPA70 fragments containing the NTD and the flexible linker (hRPA701–168). We also examined the structure of hRPA701–326 after addition of three different ssDNA substrates. Each of these substrates induced specific amide 1H and/or 15N chemical shift changes in both the NTD and SSB1. The NTD and SSB1 have similar topologies, leading to the possibility that ssDNA binding induced the chemical shift changes observed for the NTD. To test this hypothesis we monitored the amide 1H and 15N chemical shift changes of hRPA701–168 after addition of ssDNA. The same amide 1H and 15N chemical shift changes were observed for the NTD in hRPA701–168 and hRPA701–326. The NTD residues with the largest amide 1H and/or 15N chemical shift changes were localized to a basic cleft that is important for hRPA70–protein interactions. Based on this relationship, and other available data, we propose a model where binding between the NTD and ssDNA interferes with hRPA70–protein interactions.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 208 885 9230; Fax: +1 208 885 6518; Email: gdaugh{at}uidaho.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. Yuan, G. Ghosal, and J. Chen
The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks
Genes & Dev., October 15, 2009; 23(20): 2394 - 2399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. M. Dickson, Y. Krasikova, P. Pestryakov, O. Lavrik, and M. S. Wold
Essential functions of the 32 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(7): 2313 - 2326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. R. Salas, I. Petruseva, O. Lavrik, and C. Saintome
Evidence for direct contact between the RPA3 subunit of the human replication protein A and single-stranded DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(1): 38 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Binz and M. S. Wold
Regulatory Functions of the N-terminal Domain of the 70-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A (RPA)
J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21559 - 21570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. D. Bartos, L. J. Willmott, S. K. Binz, M. S. Wold, and R. A. Bambara
Catalysis of Strand Annealing by Replication Protein A Derives from Its Strand Melting Properties
J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21758 - 21768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Fanning, V. Klimovich, and A. R. Nager
A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways
Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4126 - 4137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Bochkareva, L. Kaustov, A. Ayed, G.-S. Yi, Y. Lu, A. Pineda-Lucena, J. C. C. Liao, A. L. Okorokov, J. Milner, C. H. Arrowsmith, et al.
Single-stranded DNA mimicry in the p53 transactivation domain interaction with replication protein A
PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15412 - 15417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. D. Vise, B. Baral, A. J. Latos, and G. W. Daughdrill
NMR chemical shift and relaxation measurements provide evidence for the coupled folding and binding of the p53 transactivation domain
Nucleic Acids Res., April 11, 2005; 33(7): 2061 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. E. Pestryakov, D. Y. Khlimankov, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, and O. I. Lavrik
Human replication protein A (RPA) binds a primer-template junction in the absence of its major ssDNA-binding domains
Nucleic Acids Res., March 26, 2004; 32(6): 1894 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. I. Arunkumar, M. E. Stauffer, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, and W. J. Chazin
Independent and Coordinated Functions of Replication Protein A Tandem High Affinity Single-stranded DNA Binding Domains
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41077 - 41082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Binz, Y. Lao, D. F. Lowry, and M. S. Wold
The Phosphorylation Domain of the 32-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A (RPA) Modulates RPA-DNA Interactions: EVIDENCE FOR AN INTERSUBUNIT INTERACTION
J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35584 - 35591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. W. Daughdrill, G. W. Buchko, M. V. Botuyan, C. Arrowsmith, M. S. Wold, M. A. Kennedy, and D. F. Lowry
Chemical shift changes provide evidence for overlapping single-stranded DNA- and XPA-binding sites on the 70 kDa subunit of human replication protein A
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2003; 31(14): 4176 - 4183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.