Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (559K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mass, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mass, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufmann, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 18 3892-3899
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Replication protein A modulates its interface with the primed DNA template during RNA–DNA primer elongation in replicating SV40 chromosomes

Gilad Mass, Tamar Nethanel, Olga I. Lavrik1, Marc S. Wold2 and Gabriel Kaufmann*

Department of Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel, 1Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia and 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242-1109, USA

The eukaryal single-stranded DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA) binds short oligonucleotides with high affinity but exhibits low cooperativity in binding longer templates, opposite to prokaryal counterparts. This discrepancy could reflect the smaller size of the replicative template portion availed to RPA. According to current models, this portion accommodates an RNA–DNA primer (RDP) of <40 nt (nested discontinuity) or a several-fold longer Okazaki fragment (initiation zone). Previous in situ UV-crosslinking revealed that RPA also interacts with nascent DNA, especially growing RDPs. Here we compare nascent SV40 DNA chains UV-crosslinked to the middle and large RPA subunits and use the data to re-examine the two models. The middle subunit interacted with the nascent chains after a few DNA residues were added to the RNA primer while the large subunit became accessible after extension by several more. Upon RDP maturation, the middle subunit disengaged while the large subunit remained accessible during further limited extension. A corresponding shift in preference in favor of the large subunit has been reported for purified RPA and synthetic gapped duplexes upon reduction of the gap from 19 to 9 nt. Combined, these facts support the proposal that the mature RDP faces downstream a correspondingly small gap, possibly created by removal of the RNA primer moiety from an adjacent, previously synthesized RDP (nested discontinuity) but insufficient for continuous elongation of the RDP into an Okazaki fragment (initiation zone).

* To whom correspondence should be addresssed. Tel: +972 3 640 9067; Fax: +972 3 640 6834; Email: gabika{at}tauex.tau.ac.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Fanning, V. Klimovich, and A. R. Nager
A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways
Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4126 - 4137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Liu, M. Kvaratskhelia, S. Hess, Y. Qu, and Y. Zou
Modulation of Replication Protein A Function by Its Hyperphosphorylation-induced Conformational Change Involving DNA Binding Domain B
J. Biol. Chem., September 23, 2005; 280(38): 32775 - 32783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Weisshart, P. Pestryakov, R. W. P. Smith, H. Hartmann, E. Kremmer, O. Lavrik, and H.-P. Nasheuer
Coordinated Regulation of Replication Protein A Activities by Its Subunits p14 and p32
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 35368 - 35376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. E. Pestryakov, D. Y. Khlimankov, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, and O. I. Lavrik
Human replication protein A (RPA) binds a primer-template junction in the absence of its major ssDNA-binding domains
Nucleic Acids Res., March 26, 2004; 32(6): 1894 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. E. Pestryakov, K. Weisshart, B. Schlott, S. N. Khodyreva, E. Kremmer, F. Grosse, O. I. Lavrik, and H.-P. Nasheuer
Human Replication Protein A. THE C-TERMINAL RPA70 AND THE CENTRAL RPA32 DOMAINS ARE INVOLVED IN THE INTERACTIONS WITH THE 3'-END OF A PRIMER-TEMPLATE DNA
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 17515 - 17524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
O. I. Lavrik, D. M. Kolpashchikov, R. Prasad, R. W. Sobol, and S. H. Wilson
Binary system for selective photoaffinity labeling of base excision repair DNA polymerases
Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2002; 30(14): e73 - e73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.