Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (586K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rojsitthisak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Haworth, I. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rojsitthisak, P.
Right arrow Articles by Haworth, I. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 22 4716-4723
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Extrahelical cytosine bases in DNA duplexes containing d[GCC]n·d[GCC]n repeats: detection by a mechlorethamine crosslinking reaction

Pornchai Rojsitthisak, Rebecca M. Romero and Ian S. Haworth*

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, 1985 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9121, USA

The cytosine–cytosine (C–C) pair is one of the least stable DNA mismatch pairs. The bases of the C–C mismatch are only weakly hydrogen bonded, and previous work has shown that, in certain sequence contexts, they can become unstacked from the core helix, and adopt an ‘extrahelical’ location. Here, using DNA duplexes with d[GCC]n·d[GCC]n fragments containing C–C mismatches in a 1,4 bp relationship, we show that cytosine bases of different formal mismatch pairs can be crosslinked by mechlorethamine. For example, in the duplex d[CTCTCGCCGCCGCCGTATC]·d[GATACGCCGCCGCCGAGAG], where underlined cytosine bases are present as the formal C–C mismatch pairs C7–C32, C10–C29 and C13–C26, we show that two mechlorethamine crosslinks form between C13 and C29 and between C10 and C32, in addition to crosslinks at C7–C32, C10–C29 and C13–C26 (we have reported previously the crosslinking of formal C–C pairs by mechlorethamine). We interpret the formation of the C13–C29 and C10–C32 crosslinks as evidence of an extrahelical location of the crosslinkable cytosines. Such extrahelical cytosine bases have been observed previously for a single C–C mismatch pair (in the so-called E-motif conformation). In the E-motif, the extrahelical cytosines are folded back towards the 5'-end of the duplex, consistent with our crosslinking data, and also consistent with the absence of C7–C29 and C10–C26 crosslinks in the current work. Hence, our data provide evidence for an extended E-motif DNA (eE-DNA) conformation in short d[GCC]n·d[GCC]n repeat fragments, and raise the possibility that such structures might occur in much longer d[GCC]n·d[GCC]n repeat tracts.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 323 442 3310; Fax: +1 323 442 1390; Email: ihaworth{at}usc.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.