Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (144K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manivasakam, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schiestl, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manivasakam, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schiestl, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 23 4826-4833
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Restriction enzymes increase efficiencies of illegitimate DNA integration but decrease homologous integration in mammalian cells

Palaniyandi Manivasakam, Jiri Aubrecht, Samy Sidhom and Robert H. Schiestl*

Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Mammalian cells repair DNA double-strand breaks by illegitimate end-joining or by homologous recombination. We investigated the effects of restriction enzymes on illegitimate and homologous DNA integration in mammalian cells. A plasmid containing the neoR expression cassette, which confers G418 resistance, was used to select for illegitimate integration events in CHO wild-type and xrcc5 mutant cells. Co-transfection with the restriction enzymes BamHI, BglII, EcoRI and KpnI increased the efficiency of linearized plasmid integration up to 5-fold in CHO cells. In contrast, the restriction enzymes did not increase the integration efficiency in xrcc5 mutant cells. Effects of restriction enzymes on illegitimate and homologous integration were also studied in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells using a plasmid containing the neoR gene flanked by exon 3 of Hprt. The enzymes BamHI, BglII and EcoRI increased the illegitimate integration efficiency of transforming DNA several-fold, similar to the results for CHO cells. However, all three enzymes decreased the absolute frequency of homologous integration ~2-fold, and the percentage of homologous integration decreased >10-fold. This suggests that random DNA breaks attract illegitimate recombination (IR) events that compete with homology search.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at present address: Departments of Pathology and Environmental Health, UCLA School of Medicine and Public Health, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, 71-295 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Tel: +1 310 267 2087; Fax: +1 310 267 2578; Email: rschiestl{at}mednet.ucla.edu Present addresses:Palaniyandi Manivasakam, CombinatoRx, 650 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USAJiri Aubrecht, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT 06340, USA The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Kuhne, M.-L. Tjornhammar, S. Pongor, L. Banks, and A. Simoncsits
Repair of a minimal DNA double-strand break by NHEJ requires DNA-PKcs and is controlled by the ATM/ATR checkpoint
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7227 - 7237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Kiechle, P. Manivasakam, F. Eckardt-Schupp, R. H. Schiestl, and A. A. Friedl
Promoter-trapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by radiation-assisted fragment insertion
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2002; 30(24): e136 - e136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.