Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (1917K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qian, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qian, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 8 1750-1764
© 2001 Oxford University Press

PartsList: a web-based system for dynamically ranking protein folds based on disparate attributes, including whole-genome expression and interaction information

Jiang Qian, Brad Stenger, Cyrus A. Wilson, Jimmy Lin, Ronald Jansen, Sarah A. Teichmann1, Jong Park2, Werner G. Krebs, Haiyuan Yu, Vadim Alexandrov, Nathaniel Echols and Mark Gerstein*

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, PO Box 208114, New Haven, CT 06520, USA, 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK and 2European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK

As the number of protein folds is quite limited, a mode of analysis that will be increasingly common in the future, especially with the advent of structural genomics, is to survey and re-survey the finite parts list of folds from an expanding number of perspectives. We have developed a new resource, called PartsList, that lets one dynamically perform these comparative fold surveys. It is available on the web at http://bioinfo.mbb.yale.edu/partslist and http://www.partslist.org. The system is based on the existing fold classifications and functions as a form of companion annotation for them, providing ‘global views’ of many already completed fold surveys. The central idea in the system is that of comparison through ranking; PartsList will rank the approximately 420 folds based on more than 180 attributes. These include: (i) occurrence in a number of completely sequenced genomes (e.g. it will show the most common folds in the worm versus yeast); (ii) occurrence in the structure databank (e.g. most common folds in the PDB); (iii) both absolute and relative gene expression information (e.g. most changing folds in expression over the cell cycle); (iv) protein–protein interactions, based on experimental data in yeast and comprehensive PDB surveys (e.g. most interacting fold); (v) sensitivity to inserted transposons; (vi) the number of functions associated with the fold (e.g. most multi-functional folds); (vii) amino acid composition (e.g. most Cys-rich folds); (viii) protein motions (e.g. most mobile folds); and (ix) the level of similarity based on a comprehensive set of structural alignments (e.g. most structurally variable folds). The integration of whole-genome expression and protein–protein interaction data with structural information is a particularly novel feature of our system. We provide three ways of visualizing the rankings: a profiler emphasizing the progression of high and low ranks across many pre-selected attributes, a dynamic comparer for custom comparisons and a numerical rankings correlator. These allow one to directly compare very different attributes of a fold (e.g. expression level, genome occurrence and maximum motion) in the uniform numerical format of ranks. This uniform framework, in turn, highlights the way that the frequency of many of the attributes falls off with approximate power-law behavior (i.e. according to V–b, for attribute value V and constant exponent b), with a few folds having large values and most having small values.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 203 432 6105; Fax: +1 360 838 7861; Email: mark.gerstein{at}yale.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B.-R. Kim, L. Zhang, A. Berg, J. Fan, and R. Wu
A Computational Approach to the Functional Clustering of Periodic Gene-Expression Profiles
Genetics, October 1, 2008; 180(2): 821 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Flores, N. Echols, D. Milburn, B. Hespenheide, K. Keating, J. Lu, S. Wells, E. Z. Yu, M. Thorpe, and M. Gerstein
The Database of Macromolecular Motions: new features added at the decade mark
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(suppl_1): D296 - D301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C.-S. Goh, N. Lan, N. Echols, S. M. Douglas, D. Milburn, P. Bertone, R. Xiao, L.-C. Ma, D. Zheng, Z. Wunderlich, et al.
SPINE 2: a system for collaborative structural proteomics within a federated database framework
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2003; 31(11): 2833 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Echols, D. Milburn, and M. Gerstein
MolMovDB: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2003; 31(1): 478 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. Muller, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J.E. Sternberg
Structural Characterization of the Human Proteome
Genome Res., November 1, 2002; 12(11): 1625 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Lin, J. Qian, D. Greenbaum, P. Bertone, R. Das, N. Echols, A. Senes, B. Stenger, and M. Gerstein
GeneCensus: genome comparisons in terms of metabolic pathway activity and protein family sharing
Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2002; 30(20): 4574 - 4582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Echols, P. Harrison, S. Balasubramanian, N. M. Luscombe, P. Bertone, Z. Zhang, and M. Gerstein
Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2002; 30(11): 2515 - 2523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Lo Conte, S. E. Brenner, T. J. P. Hubbard, C. Chothia, and A. G. Murzin
SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 264 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
H. Hegyi and M. Gerstein
Annotation Transfer for Genomics: Measuring Functional Divergence in Multi-Domain Proteins
Genome Res., October 1, 2001; 11(10): 1632 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. Greenbaum, N. M. Luscombe, R. Jansen, J. Qian, and M. Gerstein
Interrelating Different Types of Genomic Data, from Proteome to Secretome: 'Oming in on Function
Genome Res., September 1, 2001; 11(9): 1463 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Bertone, Y. Kluger, N. Lan, D. Zheng, D. Christendat, A. Yee, A. M. Edwards, C. H. Arrowsmith, G. T. Montelione, and M. Gerstein
SPINE: an integrated tracking database and data mining approach for identifying feasible targets in high-throughput structural proteomics
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2001; 29(13): 2884 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Mushegian and R. Medzhitov
Evolutionary perspective on innate immune recognition
J. Cell Biol., November 26, 2001; 155(5): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.