Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 1 289-293
© 2002 Oxford University Press
SUPFAMa database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes
1Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India, 2National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS-GKVK Campus, Bangalore 560 065, India and 3Biotechnology Centre, Indian Institute of TechnologyBombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
Members of a superfamily of proteins could result from divergent evolution of homologues with insignificant similarity in the amino acid sequences. A superfamily relationship is detected commonly after the three-dimensional structures of the proteins are determined using X-ray analysis or NMR. The SUPFAM database described here relates two homologous protein families in a multiple sequence alignment database of either known or unknown structure. The present release (1.1), which is the first version of the SUPFAM database, has been derived by analysing Pfam, which is one of the commonly used databases of multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins. The first step in establishing SUPFAM is to relate Pfam families with the families in PALI, which is an alignment database of homologous proteins of known structure that is derived largely from SCOP. The second step involves relating Pfam families which could not be associated reliably with a protein superfamily of known structure. The profile matching procedure, IMPALA, has been used in these steps. The first step resulted in identification of 1280 Pfam families (out of 2697, i.e. 47%) which are related, either by close homologous connection to a SCOP family or by distant relationship to a SCOP family, potentially forming new superfamily connections. Using the profiles of 1417 Pfam families with apparently no structural information, an all-against-all comparison involving a sequence-profile match using IMPALA resulted in clustering of 67 homologous protein families of Pfam into 28 potential new superfamilies. Expansion of groups of related proteins of yet unknown structural information, as proposed in SUPFAM, should help in identifying priority proteins for structure determination in structural genomics initiatives to expand the coverage of structural information in the protein sequence space. For example, we could assign 858 distinct Pfam domains in 2203 of the gene products in the genome of Mycobacterium tubercolosis. Fifty-one of these Pfam families of unknown structure could be clustered into 17 potentially new superfamilies forming good targets for structural genomics. SUPFAM database can be accessed at http://pauling.mbu.iisc.ernet.in/~supfam.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +91 80 309 2837; Fax: +91 80 360 0535; Email: ns{at}mbu.iisc.ernet.in
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Camoglu, T. Can, and A. K. Singh Integrating multi-attribute similarity networks for robust representation of the protein space Bioinformatics, July 1, 2006; 22(13): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Krishnadev, N. Rekha, S. B. Pandit, S. Abhiman, S. Mohanty, L. S. Swapna, S. Gore, and N. Srinivasan PRODOC: a resource for the comparison of tethered protein domain architectures with in-built information on remotely related domain families Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W126 - W129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Shah, P. Aloy, P. Bork, and R. B. Russell Structural similarity to bridge sequence space: Finding new families on the bridges Protein Sci., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1305 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pugalenthi, A. Bhaduri, and R. Sowdhamini GenDiS: Genomic Distribution of protein structural domain Superfamilies Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2005; 33(suppl_1): D252 - D255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Sadreyev, D. Baker, and N. V. Grishin Profile-profile comparisons by COMPASS predict intricate homologies between protein families Protein Sci., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 2262 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Gowri, S. B. Pandit, P. S. Karthik, N. Srinivasan, and S. Balaji Integration of related sequences with protein three-dimensional structural families in an updated version of PALI database Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2003; 31(1): 486 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


