Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (234K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee Kang, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Bungert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee Kang, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Bungert, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Protein-nucleic acid interaction
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 10 e44
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Combining chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA footprinting: a novel method to analyze protein–DNA interactions in vivo

Sung-Hae Lee Kang, Karen Vieira and Jörg Bungert*

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Powell Gene Therapy Center, Center for Mammalian Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

A variety of methods are available to analyze protein–DNA interactions in vivo. Two of the most prominent of these methods are chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and in vivo footprinting. Both of these procedures have specific limitations. For example, the ChIP assay fails to document where exactly a protein binds in vivo. The precipitation of a specific segment of DNA with antibodies directed against DNA-binding proteins does not necessarily indicate that the protein directly interacts with a sequence in the precipitate but could rather reflect protein–protein interactions. Furthermore, the results of in vivo footprinting studies are inconclusive if a DNA sequence is analyzed that is bound by a specific protein in only a certain fraction of cells. Finally, in vivo footprinting does not indicate which protein is bound at a specific site. We have developed a new procedure that combines the ChIP assay and DMS footprinting techniques. Using this method we show here that antibodies specific for USF1 and NF-E2 precipitate the murine ß-globin promoter in MEL cells. DMS footprinting analysis of the DNA precipitated with NF-E2 antibodies revealed a protection over a partial NF-E2-binding site in the ß-globin downstream promoter region. We believe that this novel method will generally benefit investigators interested in analyzing protein–DNA interactions in vivo.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 352 392 0121; Fax: +1 352 392 2953; Email: jbungert{at}college.med.ufl.eduThe authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. L. Bonfield, M. J. Thomassen, C. F. Farver, S. Abraham, M. T. Koloze, X. Zhang, D. M. Mosser, and D. A. Culver
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Regulates the Expression of Alveolar Macrophage Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kooren, R.-J. Palstra, P. Klous, E. Splinter, M. von Lindern, F. Grosveld, and W. de Laat
beta-Globin Active Chromatin Hub Formation in Differentiating Erythroid Cells and in p45 NF-E2 Knock-out Mice
J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2007; 282(22): 16544 - 16552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
L. Elnitski, V. X. Jin, P. J. Farnham, and S. J.M. Jones
Locating mammalian transcription factor binding sites: A survey of computational and experimental techniques
Genome Res., December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1455 - 1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P.-C. Chu, Y.-C. Yang, Y.-T. Lu, H.-T. Chen, L.-C. Yu, and M.-S. Chang
Silencing of p29 Affects DNA Damage Responses with UV Irradiation.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8484 - 8491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
X. Fang, J. Sun, P. Xiang, M. Yu, P. A. Navas, K. R. Peterson, G. Stamatoyannopoulos, and Q. Li
Synergistic and Additive Properties of the Beta-Globin Locus Control Region (LCR) Revealed by 5'HS3 Deletion Mutations: Implication for LCR Chromatin Architecture
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2005; 25(16): 7033 - 7041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L.-R. Liu, Z.-W. Du, H.-L. Zhao, X.-L. Liu, X.-D. Huang, J. Shen, L.-M. Ju, F.-D. Fang, and J.-W. Zhang
T to C Substitution at -175 or -173 of the {gamma}-Globin Promoter Affects GATA-1 and Oct-1 Binding in Vitro Differently but Can Independently Reproduce the Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin Phenotype in Transgenic Mice
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 7452 - 7459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Dame, M. C. Sola, K.-C. Lim, K. M. Leach, J. Fandrey, Y. Ma, G. Knopfle, J. D. Engel, and J. Bungert
Hepatic Erythropoietin Gene Regulation by GATA-4
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2955 - 2961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. M. Leach, K. F. Vieira, S.-H. L. Kang, A. Aslanian, M. Teichmann, R. G. Roeder, and J. Bungert
Characterization of the human {beta}-globin downstream promoter region
Nucleic Acids Res., February 15, 2003; 31(4): 1292 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. M. Kiekhaefer, J. A. Grass, K. D. Johnson, M. E. Boyer, and E. H. Bresnick
Hematopoietic-specific activators establish an overlapping pattern of histone acetylation and methylation within a mammalian chromatin domain
PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14309 - 14314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.