Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (144K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edgley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barstead, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edgley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Barstead, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Polymorphism/mutation detection
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 12 e52
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Improved detection of small deletions in complex pools of DNA

Mark Edgley, Anil D’Souza1, Gary Moulder1, Sheldon McKay, Bin Shen, Erin Gilchrist, Donald Moerman and Robert Barstead1,*

Biotechnology Laboratory and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada and 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA

About 40% of the genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have homologs in humans. Based on the history of this model system, it is clear that the application of genetic methods to the study of this set of genes would provide important clues to their function in humans. To facilitate such genetic studies, we are engaged in a project to derive deletion alleles in every gene in this set. Our standard methods make use of nested PCR to hunt for animals in mutagenized populations that carry deletions at a given locus. The deletion bearing animals exist initially in mixed populations where the majority of the animals are wild type at the target. Therefore, the production of the PCR fragment representing the deletion allele competes with the production of the wild type fragment. The size of the deletion fragment relative to wild type determines whether it can compete to a level where it can be detected above the background. Using our standard conditions, we have found that when the deletion is <600 bp, the deletion fragment does not compete effectively with the production of the wild type fragment in PCR. Therefore, although our standard methods work well to detect mutants with deletions >600 bp, they do not work well to detect mutants with smaller deletions. Here we report a new strategy to detect small deletion alleles in complex DNA pools. Our new strategy is a modification of our standard PCR based screens. In the first round of the nested PCR, we include a third PCR primer between the two external primers. The presence of this third primer leads to the production of three fragments from wild type DNA. We configure the system so that two of these three fragments cannot serve as a template in the second round of the nested PCR. The addition of this third primer, therefore, handicaps the amplification from wild type template. On the other hand, the amplification of mutant fragments where the binding site for the third primer is deleted is unabated. Overall, we see at least a 500-fold increase in the sensitivity for small deletion fragments using our new method. Using this new method, we report the recovery of new deletion alleles within 12 C.elegans genes.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 405 271 1766; Fax: +1 405 271 3153; Email: barsteadr{at}omrf.ouhsc.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
D. G. Moerman and R. J. Barstead
Towards a mutation in every gene in Caenorhabditis elegans
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, May 1, 2008; 7(3): 195 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Nilsson, B. Conradt, A.-F. Ruaud, C. C.-H. Chen, J. Hatzold, J.-L. Bessereau, B. D. Grant, and S. Tuck
Caenorhabditis elegans num-1 Negatively Regulates Endocytic Recycling
Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 375 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
E. Cuppen, E. Gort, E. Hazendonk, J. Mudde, J. van de Belt, I. J. Nijman, V. Guryev, and R. H.A. Plasterk
Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans: Toward a knockout for every gene
Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 649 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Duverger, J. Belougne, S. Scaglione, D. Brandli, C. Beclin, and J. J. Ewbank
A semi-automated high-throughput approach to the generation of transposon insertion mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Nucleic Acids Res., January 28, 2007; 35(2): e11 - e11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. R. Denver, S. Feinberg, C. Steding, M. Durbin, and M. Lynch
The Relative Roles of Three DNA Repair Pathways in Preventing Caenorhabditis elegans Mutation Accumulation
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
Y. Wang and D. E. Levy
C. elegans STAT: evolution of a regulatory switch
FASEB J, August 1, 2006; 20(10): 1641 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Abraham, H. Hutter, M. T. Palfreyman, G. Spatkowski, R. M. Weimer, R. Windoffer, E. M. Jorgensen, and R. E. Leube
Synaptic tetraspan vesicle membrane proteins are conserved but not needed for synaptogenesis and neuronal function in Caenorhabditis elegans
PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8227 - 8232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. M. Muriel, C. Dong, H. Hutter, and B. E. Vogel
Fibulin-1C and Fibulin-1D splice variants have distinct functions and assemble in a hemicentin-dependent manner
Development, October 1, 2005; 132(19): 4223 - 4234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. L. Deken, R. Vincent, G. Hadwiger, Q. Liu, Z.-W. Wang, and M. L. Nonet
Redundant Localization Mechanisms of RIM and ELKS in Caenorhabditis elegans
J. Neurosci., June 22, 2005; 25(25): 5975 - 5983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. Syntichaki and N. Tavernarakis
Genetic Models of Mechanotransduction: The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1097 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
Y. Andachi
Caenorhabditis elegans T-box genes tbx-9 and tbx-8 are required for formation of hypodermis and body-wall muscle in embryogenesis
Genes Cells, April 1, 2004; 9(4): 331 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
I. Wacker, V. Schwarz, E. M. Hedgecock, and H. Hutter
zag-1, a Zn-finger homeodomain transcription factor controlling neuronal differentiation and axon outgrowth in C. elegans
Development, August 15, 2003; 130(16): 3795 - 3805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Wei, A. Yuan, G. Fawcett, A. Butler, T. Davis, S.-y. Xu, and L. Salkoff
Efficient isolation of targeted Caenorhabditis elegans deletion strains using highly thermostable restriction endonucleases and PCR
Nucleic Acids Res., October 15, 2002; 30(20): e110 - e110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.