Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (270K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shedden, K.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shedden, K.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 13 2920-2929
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Analysis of cell-cycle gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using microarrays and multiple synchronization methods

Kerby Shedden and Stephen Cooper1,*

Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1285, USA and 1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0620, USA

Microarray analysis of gene expression during the yeast division cycle has led to the proposal that a significant number of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are expressed in a cell-cycle-specific manner. Four different methods of synchronization were used for cell-cycle analysis. Randomized data exhibit periodic patterns of lesser strength than the experimental data. Thus the cyclicities in the expression measurements in the four experiments presented do not arise from chance fluctuations or noise in the data. However, when the degree of cyclicity for genes in different experiments are compared, a large degree of non-reproducibility is found. Re-examining the phase timing of peak expression, we find that three of the experiments (those using {alpha}-factor, CDC28 and CDC15 synchronization) show consistent patterns of phasing, but the elutriation synchrony results demonstrate a different pattern from the other arrest-release synchronization methods. Specific genes can show a wide range of cyclical behavior between different experiments; a gene with high cyclicity in one experiment can show essentially no cyclicity in another experiment. The elutriation experiment, possibly being the least perturbing of the four synchronization methods, may give the most accurate characterization of the state of gene expression during the normal, unperturbed cell cycle. Under this alternative explanation, the observed cyclicities in the other three experiments are a stress response to synchronization, and may not reproduce in unperturbed cells.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 734 764 4215; Fax: +1 734 764 3562; Email: cooper{at}umich.edu Correspondence may also be addressed to Kerby Shedden. Tel: +1 734 764 0438; Fax: +1 734 763 4676; Email: kshedden{at}umich.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. E. Futschik and H. Herzel
Are we overestimating the number of cell-cycling genes? The impact of background models on time-series analysis
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2008; 24(8): 1063 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Rowicka, A. Kudlicki, B. P. Tu, and Z. Otwinowski
High-resolution timing of cell cycle-regulated gene expression
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 16892 - 16897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
F. Hermans and E. Tsiporkova
Merging microarray cell synchronization experiments through curve alignment
Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e64 - e70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A.-K. Souid, C. Gao, L. Wang, E. Milgrom, and W.-C. W. Shen
ELM1 Is Required for Multidrug Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 1919 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P. Qiu, Z. J. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu
Polynomial model approach for resynchronization analysis of cell-cycle gene expression data
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2006; 22(8): 959 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
E. F. Glynn, J. Chen, and A. R. Mushegian
Detecting periodic patterns in unevenly spaced gene expression time series using Lomb-Scargle periodograms
Bioinformatics, February 1, 2006; 22(3): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
K. Willbrand, F. Radvanyi, J.-P. Nadal, J.-P. Thiery, and T. M. A. Fink
Identifying genes from up-down properties of microarray expression series
Bioinformatics, October 15, 2005; 21(20): 3859 - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
U. de Lichtenberg, L. J. Jensen, A. Fausboll, T. S. Jensen, P. Bork, and S. Brunak
Comparison of computational methods for the identification of cell cycle-regulated genes
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 1164 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. A. Willis, K. E. Barbara, B. B. Menon, J. Moffat, B. Andrews, and G. M. Santangelo
The Global Transcriptional Activator of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gcr1p, Mediates the Response to Glucose by Stimulating Protein Synthesis and CLN-Dependent Cell Cycle Progression
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1017 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Menges, L. Hennig, W. Gruissem, and J. A. H. Murray
Cell Cycle-regulated Gene Expression in Arabidopsis
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 41987 - 42002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.