Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 20 4548-4555
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usage studies
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 472 44 62 96; Fax: +33 478 89 27 19; Email: perriere{at}biomserv.univ-lyon1.fr
Correspondence analysis has frequently been used for codon usage studies but this method is often misused. Because amino acid composition exerts constraints on codon usage, it is common to use tables containing relative codon frequencies (or ratios of frequencies) instead of simple codon counts to get rid of these amino acid biases. The problem is that some important properties of correspondence analysis, such as rows weighting, are lost in the process. Moreover, the use of relative measures sometimes introduces other biases and often diminishes the quantity of information to analyse, occasionally resulting in interpretation errors. For instance, in the case of an organism such as Borrelia burgdorferi, the use of relative measures led to the conclusion that there was no translational selection, while analyses based on codon counts show that there is a possibility of a selective effect at that level. In this paper, we expose these problems and we propose alternative strategies to correspondence analysis for studying codon usage biases when amino acid composition effects must be removed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kloster and C. Tang SCUMBLE: a method for systematic and accurate detection of codon usage bias by maximum likelihood estimation Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3819 - 3827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Puigbo, A. Romeu, and S. Garcia-Vallve HEG-DB: a database of predicted highly expressed genes in prokaryotic complete genomes under translational selection Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D524 - D527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Puigbo, E. Guzman, A. Romeu, and S. Garcia-Vallve OPTIMIZER: a web server for optimizing the codon usage of DNA sequences Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W126 - W131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Hu, H.-C. Fu, C.-H. Lin, H.-J. Su, and H.-H. Yeh Reassortment and Concerted Evolution in Banana Bunchy Top Virus Genomes J. Virol., February 15, 2007; 81(4): 1746 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. FRUTOS, A. VIARI, C. FERRAZ, A. BENSAID, A. MORGAT, F. BOYER, E. COISSAC, N. VACHIERY, J. DEMAILLE, and D. MARTINEZ Comparative Genomics of Three Strains of Ehrlichia ruminantium: A Review Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2006; 1081(1): 417 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Semon, J. R. Lobry, and L. Duret No Evidence for Tissue-Specific Adaptation of Synonymous Codon Usage in Humans Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Naya, D. Gianola, H. Romero, J. I. Urioste, and H. Musto Inferring Parameters Shaping Amino Acid Usage in Prokaryotic Genomes via Bayesian MCMC Methods Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 203 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wu, D. E. Culley, and W. Zhang Predicted highly expressed genes in the genomes of Streptomyces coelicolor and Streptomyces avermitilis and the implications for their metabolism Microbiology, July 1, 2005; 151(7): 2175 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Carbone, F. Kepes, and A. Zinovyev Codon Bias Signatures, Organization of Microorganisms in Codon Space, and Lifestyle Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 547 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Sharp, E. Bailes, R. J. Grocock, J. F. Peden, and R. E. Sockett Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria Nucleic Acids Res., February 23, 2005; 33(4): 1141 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lithwick and H. Margalit Relative predicted protein levels of functionally associated proteins are conserved across organisms Nucleic Acids Res., February 17, 2005; 33(3): 1051 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Charif, J. Thioulouse, J. R. Lobry, and G. Perrière Online synonymous codon usage analyses with the ade4 and seqinR packages Bioinformatics, February 15, 2005; 21(4): 545 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dufraigne, B. Fertil, S. Lespinats, A. Giron, and P. Deschavanne Detection and characterization of horizontal transfers in prokaryotes using genomic signature Nucleic Acids Res., January 13, 2005; 33(1): e6 - e6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. d. Reis, R. Savva, and L. Wernisch Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection Nucleic Acids Res., September 24, 2004; 32(17): 5036 - 5044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. dos Reis, L. Wernisch, and R. Savva Unexpected correlations between gene expression and codon usage bias from microarray data for the whole Escherichia coli K-12 genome Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2003; 31(23): 6976 - 6985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. C. Rocha and A. Danchin Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2003; 31(22): 6570 - 6577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bocs, S. Cruveiller, D. Vallenet, G. Nuel, and C. Medigue AMIGene: Annotation of MIcrobial Genes Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2003; 31(13): 3723 - 3726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





